Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Jun 22.
Published in final edited form as: J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2008 Fall;20(4):390–408. doi: 10.1176/appi.neuropsych.20.4.390

TABLE 4.

A Comparison Between Some Models of OCD

Model Type Strengths Limitations
Standard Neuroanatomic Consistent with imaging, surgical, and lesion findings Does not explain psychological symptoms of OCD
Direct/indirect striatal pathway Neuroanatomic Refines the standard model Does not explain psychological symptoms of OCD
Executive dysfunction Integrative Patients with prefrontal cortex damage and executive dysfunction can demonstrate perseverative behaviors The extent of executive dysfunction in idiopathic OCD is unclear
Failure of inhibition Integrative OCD patients demonstrate deficits of response inhibition Connection of finding to symptoms of OCD not yet clear
Release Integrative Utilizes findings on the basal ganglia from animal research Focuses on basal ganglia, difficulty applying simple behaviors in lizards to the symptoms of OCD in humans
Feeling of knowing Psychological Provides a richer explanation of the symptoms of OCD Does not specify nature or anatomical location of representations responsible for symptoms
SEC/OCD model Integrative Integrates neuroanatomical and psychological explanations of the symptoms of OCD Many hypotheses, such as the rewarding properties of behavioral sequences and the behavioral effects of brain lesions, are untested

SEC = structured event complex; OCD = obsessive-compulsive disorder