Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Oct 28.
Published in final edited form as: Nat Commun. 2015 Apr 28;6:6885. doi: 10.1038/ncomms7885

Table 1. Meta-analyses of neuropeptides.

These meta-analyses were conducted as one sample t-tests using the 16 studies shown in Supplementary Table 1 (significance p = 0.05). In these analyses: For GAL, all 16 were used; Sengupta, Peng Head Neck 2, TCGA, Ye, Cromer and Pyeon Tongue were significant. For BDNF, all 16 were used; Sengupta, Peng Head Neck 2, Ye and Pyeon Floor of Mouth were significant. For NGF, all 16 were used; Peng, Estilo and Talbot were significant. For GDNF, only 12 were used (four of the studies did not look at GDNF levels); Peng Head Neck 2 and TCGA were significant. For NTF3, all 16 were used; TCGA and Peng 2 were significant. For NPY, all 16 were used; TCGA and Peng 2 were significant. For PYY, all 16 were used; Peng Head Neck 2 was significant. For VIP, all 16 were used; Peng Head Neck 2 was significant.

Full Name (Gene) N (Significant / Non-
Significant Studies)
t-test (df) P
Galanin (GAL) 16 (6/10) 2.6 (15) 0.01005
Brain-derived neurotrophic factor
(BDNF)
16 (4/12) 1.789 (15) 0.025
Neural growth factor (NGF) 16 (3/13) 1.364 (15) 0.0963
Glial cell line-derived neurotrophic
factor (GDNF)
12 (2/10) 1.0393 (11) 0.1607
Neurotrophin-3 (NTF3) 16 (2/14) 0.8783 (15) 0.1968
Neuropeptide Y (NPY) 16 (2/14) 0.8783 (15) 0.1968
Peptide YY (PYY) 16 (1/15) 0.2 (15) 0.4221
Vasoactive Intestinal Peptide (VIP) 16 (1/15) 0.2 (15) 0.4221