Table 3.
Performance of the CRF and RSVM predictors evaluated by the AUC measure of performance. For the training set the performance of the CRF is estimated by the OOB error and for the RSVM by the leave-one-out cross-validation. The predictive features selected by each method are listed in the respective columns. Both methods selection was applied to the initial set of convergent genes.
| Method | CRF | RSVM | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Data Set | # convergent genes | Selected features | train AUC | test AUC | Selected features | train AUC | test AUC |
| Golub ALL AML | 80 | 8 | 1.000 | 0.857 | 60 | 1.000 | 0.893 |
| ProstateCancer | 79 | 5 | 0.963 | 0.958 | 79 | 0.938 | 0.917 |
| BrCaMetastasis | 103 | 8 | 0.862 | 0.815 | 103 | 0.818 | 0.679 |
| antTNF-response | 40 | 8 | 0.890 | 0.750 | 40 | 0.828 | 0.500 |