Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Jun 22.
Published in final edited form as: Genomics. 2009 Aug 20;94(6):423–432. doi: 10.1016/j.ygeno.2009.08.008

Table 3.

Performance of the CRF and RSVM predictors evaluated by the AUC measure of performance. For the training set the performance of the CRF is estimated by the OOB error and for the RSVM by the leave-one-out cross-validation. The predictive features selected by each method are listed in the respective columns. Both methods selection was applied to the initial set of convergent genes.

Method CRF RSVM
Data Set # convergent genes Selected features train AUC test AUC Selected features train AUC test AUC
Golub ALL AML 80 8 1.000 0.857 60 1.000 0.893
ProstateCancer 79 5 0.963 0.958 79 0.938 0.917
BrCaMetastasis 103 8 0.862 0.815 103 0.818 0.679
antTNF-response 40 8 0.890 0.750 40 0.828 0.500