Skip to main content
. 2015 Jun 16;8:137–155. doi: 10.2147/TACG.S60472

Table 4.

Comparison of the diagnostic criteria of MFS according to the Berlin versus Ghent-1 nosology

Berlin nosology Ghent-1 nosology
Skeletal manifestations Skeletal system – major criterion (≥4 of the major criteria from the following list):
Anterior chest deformity, especially asymmetric pectus excavatum/carinatum Pectus carinatum
Pectus excavatum that requires surgery
Dolichostenomelia not due to scoliosis or tall stature, especially when compared to unaffected first-degree relatives Upper-to-lower-segment ratio <0.85 or arm span-to-height ratio >1.05
Arachnodactyly Positive wrist and thumb sign
Medial displacement of the medial malleolus causing pes planus
Vertebral column deformity: scoliosis; thoracic lordosis; or reduced thoracic kyphosis Scoliosis >20° or spondylolisthesis
Extension at elbows <170°
Protrusio acetabulae Protrusio acetabuli of any degree
Skeletal system – minor criteria (skeletal involvement with two of the major criteria or one of the major and two of the minor criteria)
Pectus excavatum not requiring surgery
Abnormal appendicular joint mobility: congenital flexion contractures; hypermobility Joint hypermobility
High, narrowly arched palate and dental crowding High-arched palate with crowding of teeth
Facial features (3/5): dolichocephaly; enophthalmos; downslanting palpebral fissures; malar hypoplasia; retrognathia
Ocular manifestations Ocular system – major criterion
Ectopia lentis* Ectopia lentis of any degree
Ocular system – minor criteria (ocular involvement with ≥2 minor criteria):
Flat cornea Flat cornea
Elongated globe, retinal detachment, myopia Increased axial length of the globe (>23.5 mm)
Hypoplastic ciliary muscle causing decreased miosis
Cardiovascular manifestations Cardiovascular system – major criteria
Dilatation of the ascending aorta* Aneurysm of the ascending aorta involving at least the sinuses of Valsalva
Aortic dissection,* aortic regurgitation Dissection of the ascending aorta
Cardiovascular system – minor criteria (cardiovascular involvement with one major or ≥1 minor criterion)
Mitral regurgitation due to mitral valve prolapse, mitral valve prolapse Mitral valve prolapse (irrespective of mitral regurgitation)
Dilatation of the main pulmonary artery <40 years of age (unassociated with pulmonic stenosis)
Calcification of the mitral annulus Calcification of the mitral annulus <40 years of age
Abdominal aortic aneurysm; dysrhythmia; endocarditis Dilatation or dissection of the descending thoracic or abdominal aorta <50 years of age
Pulmonary manifestations Pulmonary system – minor criteria (pulmonary involvement with ≥1 minor criteria)
Spontaneous pneumothorax Spontaneous pneumothorax
Apical bleb Apical blebs (radiography)
Skin and integument Skin and integument – minor criteria (skin and integumental involvement with ≥1 minor criteria)
Striae distensae Striae distensae
Inguinal hernia, other hernia (umbilical, diaphragmatic, incisional) Recurrent or incisional hernia
Central nervous system manifestations Dura: major criterion
Dural ectasia,* lumbosacral meningocele, dilated cisterna magna, learning disability (verbal performance discrepancy), hyperactivity with or without attention deficit disorder Lumbosacral dural ectasia
Genetics Family and genetic history (present with ≥1 major criterion)
First-degree relative who independently meets the Marfan criteria
Autosomal dominant inheritance Mutation in FBN1 known to cause MFS
25%–30% of cases are sporadic; paternal age effect Haplotype around the FBN1 locus inherited via descent and is unequivocally associated with a diagnosed Marfan in the family
Requirements for diagnosis Requirements for diagnosis
In the absence of an unequivocally affected first-degree relative: involvement of the skeleton and at least two other systems; at least one major manifestation.
In the presence of at least one unequivocally affected first-degree relative: involvement of at least two systems; at least one major manifestation preferred, but this will depend somewhat on the family’s phenotype.
For the index case: if the family/genetic history is not contributory, then major criteria in at least two different organ systems and involvement of a third organ system. If a mutation known to cause MFS in others is detected, then one major criterion in an organ system and involvement of a second organ system.
For a relative of an index case: the presence of a major criterion in the family history, as well as one major criterion in an organ system and involvement of a second organ system.

Notes: Berlin nosology: *major diagnostic manifestations. Data from Beighton et al.164 Ghent-1 nosology: distinction between a major criterion and the organ system “being involved”, which is less important than a major criterion. Data from De Paepe et al.76

Abbreviation: MFS, Marfan syndrome.