Table 2.
Difference of CT-based and X-ray image projection angles automatically computed for varying approaches on instrumented cadavers compared with the gold standard, where fiducials are placed in the specimen
CT reformats
|
X-ray projection images
|
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
F-CE | F-AC | S-AC | AcAV | CE | AC | |
Trial 1 (left hip) | ||||||
BGS | −0.5 | 0.4 | 0.6 | 2.2 | −0.7 | 0.6 |
PCR | 0.8 | −0.8 | 1.5 | 3.7 | 2.4 | −2.1 |
Postop | 4.9 | −1.0 | −8.1 | −0.3 | −2.3 | 3.6 |
Trial 2 (left hip) | ||||||
BGS | 1.6 | −1.9 | 0.2 | 1.2 | 1.8 | −1.7 |
PCR | 0.5 | −1.0 | 0.6 | 0.9 | 0.8 | −0.8 |
Postop | −4.9 | 0.7 | −2.1 | −0.2 | −2.6 | −1.3 |
“BGS” is computed intraoperatively using the system; “PCR” is the postoperative contour registration. “Postop” uses the acetabular lunate segmented directly from the postoperative CT scan. All measurements are in degrees