Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Jun 22.
Published in final edited form as: Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2014 Sep 19;10(4):497–508. doi: 10.1007/s11548-014-1116-7

Table 2.

Difference of CT-based and X-ray image projection angles automatically computed for varying approaches on instrumented cadavers compared with the gold standard, where fiducials are placed in the specimen

CT reformats
X-ray projection images
F-CE F-AC S-AC AcAV CE AC
Trial 1 (left hip)
BGS −0.5 0.4 0.6 2.2 −0.7 0.6
PCR 0.8 −0.8 1.5 3.7 2.4 −2.1
Postop 4.9 −1.0 −8.1 −0.3 −2.3 3.6
Trial 2 (left hip)
BGS 1.6 −1.9 0.2 1.2 1.8 −1.7
PCR 0.5 −1.0 0.6 0.9 0.8 −0.8
Postop −4.9 0.7 −2.1 −0.2 −2.6 −1.3

“BGS” is computed intraoperatively using the system; “PCR” is the postoperative contour registration. “Postop” uses the acetabular lunate segmented directly from the postoperative CT scan. All measurements are in degrees