Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Jun 22.
Published in final edited form as: Biotechnol Bioeng. 2013 Nov 30;111(4):829–841. doi: 10.1002/bit.25145

Table III.

The dimensions of the constructs used for mechanical testing.

Dimensions (mm), diameter (D), and height (h)
Volume (mm3)
Scaffold 0 week 3 week 6 week 0 week 3 week 6 week
PLGA
  (D) 4.45±0.03 123±18
  (h) 7.9±1.2
TGF
  (D) 10a 7.25±0.31a 656±42 125±37
  (h) 7.98±0.76 3.03±0.86a
CS
  (D) 3.22±0.16 6.5±0.14b 4.63±0.55b 41±11 272±22 107±21
  (h) 4.7±1.2 8.2±1.0b 6.35±0.40
TGF-CS
  (D) 6.6±0.08b 4.4±0.6b 278±13 86±15
  (h) 7.88±0.34b 5.71±0.44
BMP
  (D) 8a 6a 428±9 117±42
  (h) 8.4±0.3 4.2±1.5a
BG
  (D) 4.7±0.1 9a 8.1 805±2 484±72
  (h) 6.70±0.38 13.3±1.1b 9.4±1.4 116±6
BMP-BG
  (D) 6.6±0.6a 5 303±37 93±23
  (h) 8.1 4.7±1.2
GRADIENT
  (D) 7b 5.17±0.46 340±32 124±34
  (h) 8.7±1.0 5.83±0.72

Scaffolds without growth factors were used for week 0 analysis. Values represented are averages + standard deviation of n = 3, P < 0.05.

a

Statistically significant difference from week 0 PLGA samples.

b

Statistically significant difference from the respective raw material supplemented group at week 0.