Skip to main content
. 2015 Apr 1;20(4):292–298. doi: 10.1016/j.rpor.2015.03.002

Table 3.

Differences in residual position errors of the landmarks after the described improvements made in the patient setup process (current − previous result, mm). Changes in the van Herk margins (3D) are given in the parenthesis.

Structure Systematic error Σ (1 SD)
Random error σ (1 SD)
AP/vertical SI/longitudinal LAT/lateral AP/vertical SI/longitudinal LAT/lateral
Rigid targeta −0.1 (−0.7) −0.3 (−0.8) 0.1 (−0.5) −0.5c −0.3 −0.5c
Observer error −0.3 (−1.0)c −0.1 (−0.5) −0.1 (−0.5) −0.3 −0.3 −0.4c
C1–2b −0.9 (−2.6)c −0.5 (−1.5)c −0.5 (−1.5)c −0.6c −0.3c −0.4c
C5–7b −0.6 (−1.6)c −0.4 (−1.5)c 0.1 (0.0) −0.2 −0.6c −0.3
Mandibleb −0.9 (−2.5)c −0.7 (−2.2)c −0.1 (−0.6) −0.4 −0.5c −0.4c
Occiput boneb −1.0 (−3.1)c −0.3 (−1.0)c −0.7c −0.4c
a

For weekly IGRT including inter-observer variation.

b

For daily IGRT including inter-observer variation.

c

The difference is statistically significant (p ≤ 0.05).