Skip to main content
. 2015 Jun 9;2015:614035. doi: 10.1155/2015/614035

Table 3.

Factors associated with the odds ratio for incorrect selection of biopsy site (total number of observations 1829).

Factora Number of
observations
Number (%) with
incorrect biopsy site
P Univariate
odds ratio (95% CI)
Multivariate
odds ratio (95% CI)b
Colposcopic impression
 Negative NA NA 0.000
 G1 472 46 (9.7) 1.00 (referent) 1.00 (referent)
 G2 1121 85 (7.6) 0.76 (0.52–1.11) 0.46 (0.27–0.80)
 Cancer 236 2 (0.8) 0.08 (0.02–0.33) 0.09 (0.02–0.42)
Squamocolumnar junction
 Visible 1416 85 (6.0) 0.000 1.00 (referent) 1.00 (referent)
 Not, or not entirely, visible 413 48 (11.6) 2.06 (1.42–2.99) 2.46 (1.62–3.73)
Original histological diagnosis
 CIN1 413 35 (8.5) 0.001 1.00 (referent) 1.00 (referent)
 CIN2 236 21 (8.9) 1.05 (0.60–1.86) 1.97 (1.01–3.85)
 CIN3/AIS 944 75 (7.9) 0.93 (0.61–1.42) 2.52 (1.32–4.80)
 Invasive carcinoma 236 2 (0.8) 0.09 (0.02–0.39) 0.29 (0.06–1.34)

G1: abnormal, grade 1; G2: abnormal, grade 2; Cancer: suspected invasive cancer; CIN: cervical intraepithelial neoplasia; AIS: adenocarcinoma in situ; CI: confidence interval; NA: not applicable.

aPatient age, colposcopist age, and participation in previous local quality assurance initiatives were not associated with incorrect selection of biopsy site in univariate analysis (P > 0.05) and were not included in logistic regression analysis.

bFrom a multiple logistic regression model with backward stepwise selection of variables. The level for removal of variables was set at P = 0.10.