Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Jun 23.
Published in final edited form as: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010 Mar 16;78(5):1331–1336. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.09.044

Table 1.

Clinical characteristics and outcomes

Patient Age Follow−up (mo) FIGO stage LN status1 Grade Relapse2 Survival NF− κB Pre3 NF− κB Post4
1 47 59 IIIA Pelvic 3 none Alive
2 56 16 IIB Pelvic + PA 2 distant Alive
3 40 74 IB2 none 2 none Alive
4 36 50 IIB none 2 none Dead
5 53 43 IB2 Pelvic pelvic Dead
6 54 56 IIB none 2 distant Alive +
7 49 9 IIB none 3 paraaortic Dead +
8 44 76 IIB none 2 none Alive +
9 54 79 IIB none none Alive +
10 61 41 IIIB Pelvic 3 central Dead +
11 66 34 IIIB Pelvic + PA 2 distant Dead +
12 46 32 IIB Pelvic 3 paraaortic Dead
13 30 19 IB2 Pelvic 3 paraaortic Dead +
14 33 73 IB2 none 2 none Alive
15 40 43 IIB none none Alive +
16 28 34 IB2 Pelvic 3 central Dead

FIGO, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics

1

CT evidence of pelvic and/or para-aortic (PA) lymph node involvement prior to chemoradiation

2

Site of first relapse

3

NF-κB expression before treatment initiation

4

NF-κB expression 2 days after treatment initiation