Skip to main content
. 2015 May 9;75(5):204. doi: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-015-3397-6

Fig. 22.

Fig. 22

The change, in the u and d PDFs at NLO for Q=104GeV2, in going from the MSTW values to those in the present global NLO fit, which includes the LHC data. Also shown are comparisons of the percentage errors in the two analyses