Table 7.

National scale-up self-reported confidence gains before and after FT workshop^a

	Before			After
Learning objective	N	Mean	SD	N	Mean	SD	Difference*
To utilize the available RMT curricula and supporting resources	85	2.35	0.812	85	3.62	0.511	p < 0.001
To describe evidence to support the effectiveness RMT	85	2.04	0.906	85	3.48	0.590	p < 0.001
To facilitate RMT using the process-based approach	85	2.21	0.832	85	3.41	0.563	p < 0.001
To recruit mentors to participate in training	83	2.31	0.869	83	3.17	0.640	p < 0.001
To implement RMT at your home institution	85	2.09	0.854	85	3.29	0.737	p < 0.001
To use metrics and tools to assess the effectiveness and impact of RMT	84	2.04	0.813	84	3.29	0.632	p < 0.001

*Significant statistical difference in ratings before and after FT was determined by Wilcoxon signed-rank test.

^aMean confidence gains in facilitation skills among attendees retrospectively after FT at four national Facilitating Entering Mentoring workshops (n = 85). Self-confidence was measured using a Likert-like scale with 1 = no confidence, 2 = low confidence, 3 = some confidence, and 4 = much confidence.