Skip to main content
. 2015 May;24(2):150–163. doi: 10.1044/2014_AJSLP-14-0075

Table 4.

Comparison of adolescent SSD groups on demographics (gender, age, PIQ, and SES).

Group Adolescent demographic
Male:female ratioa Age in years M (SD) PIQb,c,e M (SD) SESb,d (%)
1 2 3 4 5
No SSD-AD (n = 137) 68:69 13.96 (2.09) 110.00 (12.10) 2 10 17 33 38
Resolved SSD (n = 105) 72:33 14.02 (1.93) 105.48 (15.33) 2 7 14 42 35
Low MSW (n = 33) 22:11 13.53 (1.93) 99.69 (15.00) 19 3 26 23 29
Persistent SSD (n = 41) 29:12 13.43 (1.77) 94.80 (16.48) 0 7.5 27.5 35 30
Total (N = 316) 191:125 13.87 (1.99) 105.08 (15.75) 4 8 18 35 35

Note. SSD = speech sound disorders; PIQ = Performance IQ scores from the WISC-III or WAIS-IV; SES = Ratings on the Hollingshead Four Factor Index of Social Class (1 = low SES, 5 = high SES); MSW = Multisyllabic Word Repetition task. For male:female ratio, χ2(3, 315) = 11.94, p = .0074. For age in years, η2 = .013, F(3, 315) = 1.32, p = .2688. For PIQ, η2 = .121, F(3, 264) = 11.94, p < .0001. For SES, η2 = .024, χ2(8, 309) = 34.33, p = .0006.

a

No SSD-AD group differs from resolved group.

b

No SSD-AD group differs from low MSW group.

c

No SSD-AD group differs from persistent SSD group.

d

Resolved SSD group differs from low MSW group.

e

Resolved SSD group differs from persistent SSD group.