Table 1. Examples of conformational dependent α2M activities.
Function | Native α2M | Transformed α2M | Dissociated α2M dimer | References |
---|---|---|---|---|
Protease trapping | Yes | No | No* | [21, 66, 67] |
Binding to LRP | No | Yes | Yes, providing the treatment does not denature the receptor binding domain* † | [2, 3, 68] |
Chaperone activity | Yes | Yes, α2M-protease complexes can also prevent protein aggregation by degrading substrates | Yes, enhanced compared to the native α2M* ‡ | [13, 16, 17, 32, 69] |
Binding to Aβ1–40 or Aβ1–42 peptide | Yes, but to oligomers only, early on the amyloid forming pathway | Yes, binds monomeric and oligomeric Aβ | Yes, binds monomeric and oligomeric Aβ with higher affinity than native α2M* | [17, 32, 45] |
Binding to TGF-β1 | Yes; KD = 330 ± 130 nM | Yes; KD = 80 ± 11 nM | Markedly reduced compared to native α2M* | [40, 70] |
Binding to TGF-β2 | Yes; KD = 11 ± 3 nM | Yes; KD = 13 ± 2 nM | Markedly reduced compared to native α2M* | [40, 70] |
Binding to TNF-α | Only weakly; KD > 1.27 ± 0.17 µM | Only weakly; KD > 0.75 ± 0.10 µM | Markedly increased compared to native α2M* | [40, 70] |
* α2M dimers generated by hypochlorite treatment.
† α2M dimers generated by thiocyanate treatment.
‡ α2M dimers generated by SDS treatment.