Table 8.
Intervention Effect Over Time: Group Means from Adjusted Random Intercept Modelsa
| Measure | Mean (SE)
|
p-value | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | Telephone | Video | ||
|
|
|
|||
| Child’s health care | 8.1 (0.2) | 8.8 (0.2)* | 8.3 (0.2) | 0.019 |
| Child’s personal doctor | 8.8 (0.2) | 9.6 (0.2)** | 9.3 (0.1)* | 0.001 |
| Family centered careb | 18.0 (0.4) | 19.0 (0.4) | 18.2 (0.3) | 0.055 |
| Getting needed care | 3.2 (0.2) | 3.4 (0.1) | 3.2 (0.1) | 0.337 |
| Getting care quickly | 3.5 (0.1) | 3.4 (0.1) | 3.5 (0.1) | 0.893 |
| Provider communication | 3.6 (0.1) | 3.9 (0.1)** | 3.8 (0.1) | 0.007 |
| Care coordination adequacy | 2.4 (0.2) | 2.9 (0.2)* | 2.7 (0.1)* | 0.026 |
| Help Discrepancy | 17.7 (8.0) | 11.5 (7.7) | 20.1 (6.3) | 0.555 |
a
Adjusted for baseline score, year, age at start, gender, number of CCCs, NI, and TA. Pairwise comparisons adjusted for multiple comparisons using Tukey-Kramer method.
b
Interaction between year and group: unadjusted p=0.0364; Control is lower than Telephone group in Year 1 (see Table 7).
Post hoc comparisons:
*
Indicates mean is significantly higher than mean for control group at p<.05
**
Indicates mean is significantly higher than mean for control group at p<.01