Table 1.
Quality of included studies based on PEDro.a
| Study | Criterion 1 |
Criterion 2 |
Criterion 3 |
Criterion 4 |
Criterion 5 |
Criterion 6 |
Criterion 7 |
Criterion 8 |
Criterion 9 |
Criterion 10 |
Criterion 11 |
Total Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hoyer et al, 201225, b | Yes | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 8 |
| Globas et al, 201222 | Yes | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 8 |
| Kuys et al, 201222 | Yes | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 7 |
| Duncan et al, 201126, b | Yes | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 8 |
| Langhammer et al, 201024 | Yes | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 8 |
| Dean et al, 201027, b | Yes | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 7 |
| Luft et al, 200813 | Yes | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 7 |
| Macko et al, 200514 | Yes | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 7 |
| Suputtitada et al, 200415, b | Yes | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 7 |
| Ada et al, 200316 | Yes | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 7 |
| Pohl et al, 200217 | Yes | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 6 |
| da Cunha et al, 200218, b | Yes | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| Nilsson et al, 200119, b | Yes | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 7 |
| Laufer et al, 200120 | Yes | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 7 |
| Kosak and Reding, 200021, b | Yes | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 5 |
a
(1) Eligibility criteria specified, (2) random allocation, (3) concealed allocation, (4) groups similar at baseline, (5) subject blinding, (6) therapist blinding, (7) assessor blinding, (8) less than 15% drop-outs, (9) intention-to-treat analysis, (10) between-group statistical comparisons, and (11) point measures and variability data.11
b
Rows in boldface denote studies that used body weight support treadmill training (n = 7).