Skip to main content
. 2015 May 27;145(7):1569–1575. doi: 10.3945/jn.114.204925

TABLE 3.

Association between protein intake and quadriceps strength in men and women from the Framingham Offspring Cohort1

Quartiles of protein intake
Quartile 1 Quartile 2 Quartile 3 Quartile 4 P-trend
Men, n 361 303 252 244
 Total protein (median intake), g/d 64.2 70.2 78.9 101.6
  Total protein 21.9 ± 0.3 22.2 ± 0.4 22.9 ± 0.4 22.6 ± 0.4 0.08
  Animal protein2 22.3 ± 0.4 21.8 ± 0.4 22.8 ± 0.4 22.6 ± 0.4 0.30
  Plant protein2 21.7 ± 0.3 22.1 ± 0.4 22.9 ± 0.4 22.9 ± 0.4 0.01
Women, n 297 352 425 422
 Total protein (median intake), g/d 56.9 63.1 73.4 93.6
  Total protein 18.0 ± 0.3 18.1 ± 0.3 18.8 ± 0.3 18.5 ± 0.3 0.10
  Animal protein2 18.3 ± 0.3a,b 17.7 ± 0.3a 18.8 ± 0.3b 18.4 ± 0.3a,b 0.30
  Plant protein2 18.2 ± 0.3a,b 17.9 ± 0.3a 18.3 ± 0.3a,b 19.0 ± 0.3b 0.01
1

Values are least squares means ± SEs unless otherwise indicated. Total n = 1160 men and 1496 women. The primary predictor was energy-adjusted residuals added to a constant, in which the constant equals the protein intake for the mean energy intake of the study population. Least squares means were adjusted for age, height, BMI, energy intake, physical activity, health status, and women’s menopause status. Adjustment for multiple comparisons was conducted with the use of Tukey’s test. Labeled means in a row without a common letter differ, P < 0.05. P-trend considered significant when <0.05 and considered marginally significant when <0.1.

2

Animal protein intake and plant protein intake were adjusted for each other in the same model.