Skip to main content
. 2014 May 28;1(1):015001. doi: 10.1117/1.NPh.1.1.015001

Table 4.

ADHD intermedication (MPHpost-pre versus PLApost-pre) comparison.

    MPHpost-pre minus PLApost-pre MPHpost-pre versus PLApost-pre
    Mean SD t p
RT for correct trials (ms) Target 4.5 61.0 0.346 0.733ns
Standard 18.4 86.3 1.000 0.329ns
CV for correct trials Target 3.6 7.6 2.230 0.037*
Standard 1.6 9.7 0.787 0.440ns
Commission error (%) Target 6.7 14.4 2.171 0.042*
Standard 0.9 2.7 1.604 0.124ns
Omission error (%) Target 6.7 24.4 1.280 0.215ns
Standard 0.8 11.6 0.321 0.751ns
Accuracy (%) Target 3.2 30.4 0.491 0.628ns
Standard 0.2 11.5 0.062 0.951ns
Oxy-Hb (mM·mm) Right CH 10 0.065 0.093 3.266 0.004**

Note: Performance data (RT for correct trials, CV for correct trials, commission error, omission error, accuracy) are presented for target and standard trial data from oddball blocks. Data for intermedication comparison (i.e., MPHpost-pre versus PLApost-pre) are shown for ADHD subjects. Mean values were calculated by first subtracting the values of MPHpost-pre from those of PLApost-pre for each subject and then averaging the resulting values across subjects. SD was calculated similarly. t value and p value and statistical significance were the results of two-sample t-tests between MPHpost-pre and PLApost-pre. MPHpost-pre, difference between post- and pre-MPH; PLApost-pre, difference between post- and pre-placebo; SD, standard deviation; t, t value; p, p value. Statistical significances are presented as follows: *p<0.05; **p<0.01; and ns, not significant.