Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Jan 31.
Published in final edited form as: Metallomics. 2015 Feb;7(2):289–298. doi: 10.1039/c4mt00292j

Table 2.

Significant comparison (P-values) from lifespan experiments (Figure 6).

Comparison p-values (log-rank test)
N2 0mM MnCl2 vs. DAF-16::GFP 0mM MnCl2 p<0.05*
N2 0mM MnCl2 vs. DAF-16::GFP; pdr-1.2(tm1346) 0mM MnCl2 p<0.05*
DAF-16::GFP 0mM MnCl2 vs. DAF-16::GFP; pdr-1.2(tm1346) 0mM
MnCl2 		p=0.7812
N2 0mM MnCl2 vs. N2 50mM MnCl2 p=0.1799
DAF-16::GFP 0mM MnCl2 vs. DAF-16::GFP 50mM MnCl2 p=0.4896
DAF-16::GFP; pdr-1.2(tm1346) 0mM MnCl2 vs. DAF-16::GFP; pdr-
1.2(tm1346) 50mM MnCl2 		p=0.4671
N2 50mM MnCl2 vs. DAF-16::GFP 50mM MnCl2 P<0.05*
N2 50mM MnCl2 vs. DAF-16::GFP; pdr-1.2(tm1346) 50mM MnCl2 p<0.01**
DAF-16::GFP 50mM MnCl2 vs. DAF-16::GFP; pdr-1.2(tm1346)
50mM MnCl2 		p=0.1903