Skip to main content
. 2015 Jun 24;8:31. doi: 10.1186/s12920-015-0102-4

Table 2.

Differential miRNA expression between non-metastatic and metastatic OSCC samples

Fold change (N0/N+) P value
hsa-mir-31-5p 3.33 2.02E-002
hsa-mir-130b-5p 3.04 3.14E-002
hsa-mir-301a-3p 2.29 1.06E-001
hsa-mir-1301 −2.07 1.89E-001
hsa-mir-551b-3p −2.10 1.60E-001
hsa-mir-345-5p −2.22 1.37E-001
hsa-mir-30a-5p −2.31 1.25E-001
hsa-mir-326 −2.32 1.18E-001
hsa-mir-769-5p −2.35 1.13E-001
hsa-mir-139-5p −2.40 1.02E-001
hsa-mir-218-5p −2.72 6.69E-002
hsa-mir-106a-5p −2.81 8.02E-002
hsa-mir-335-5p −3.56 2.16E-002
hsa-mir-296-5p −3.58 2.21E-002
hsa-mir-20b-5p −3.88 1.54E-002
hsa-mir-23c −4.98 4.83E-003
hsa-mir-1277-3p −9.82 1.80E-004
hsa-mir-181d-5p −10.01 1.66E-004

Positive Fold Change: higher expression in non-metastasized OSCC; negative Fold Change: higher expression in metastasized OSCC. p-values were adjusted using the False Discovery Rate (FDR) correction and adjusted p values < 0.05 are in bold in order to highlight statistical significance. The suffix 3p/5p indicate which of the two arms of the miRNA was considered in the analysis, being either exclusively expressed or predominantly expressed in the dataset (Additional files 2 and 3 present detailed information on the expression levels of each arm)