Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Jun 24.
Published in final edited form as: Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2013 Feb 13;87(2):022704. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.87.022704

Figure 2.

Figure 2

The maximal change of the variance with time (+), i.e. maxt,idΠ0iizz(t,t)dt where Π0zz is obtained from Eqs. 27 and 28, depends on the mutation rate as an inverse power law. Shown are calculations for a nonepistatic version of the landscape as described in section 4 with a) two possible mutations — r0 = 0, Δr1 ≈ 0.049, Δr2 ≈ 0.010, b) three possible mutations — r0 = 0, Δr1 ≈ 0.049, Δr2 ≈ 0.010, Δr3 ≈ 0.002 — and c) four possible mutations — r0 = 0, Δr1 ≈ 0.049, Δr2 ≈ 0.020, Δr3 ≈ 0.006, Δr4 ≈ 0.002. In this case, the fitness of each state is simply the sum of contribution from each mutation. The solid lines indicate power law fits using the values for μ ≤ 10−5. Their exponents are a) −1.999, b) −2.989, and c) −3.939. The exponent is observed to be equal to the number of mutational steps in the landscape.