Table 12. Predicted probabilities of good performance at different scores on recommended QoPIIPC index using Tanzania Round 1 (incl. Zanzibar) data.
Recommended QoPIIPC index (% frequency) n = 282 | Predicted probability (CI) of good performance—relative 1 | Predicted probability (CI) of good performance—absolute 2 |
---|---|---|
0 (0.35%) | <0.001 | <0.001 |
1 (0.00%) | <0.001 | <0.001 |
2 (0.00%) | <0.001 | <0.001 |
3 (0.35%) | <0.001 | <0.001 |
5 (2.48%) | <0.001 | <0.001 |
6 (2.13%) | <0.001 [<0.001–0.001] | <0.001 |
7 (3.55%) | <0.001 [<0.001–0.002] | <0.001 [<0.001–0.001] |
8 (5.32%) | 0.001 [<0.001–0.004] | <0.001 [<0.001–0.001] |
9 (9.93%) | 0.002 [<0.001–0.001] | <0.001 [<0.001–0.002] |
10 (7.09%) | 0.005 [0.001–0.020] | <0.001 [<0.001–0.003] |
11 (12.06%) | 0.013 [0.004–0.040] | <0.001 [<0.001–0.005] |
12 (10.64%) 3 | 0.036 [0.015–0.082] | <0.001 [<0.001–0.009] |
13 (10.28%) | 0.093 [0.051–0.164] | 0.001 [<0.001–0.016] |
14 (8.16%) | 0.222 [0.152–0.312] | 0.002 [<0.001–0.029] |
15 (10.64%) | 0.441 [0.342–0.546] | 0.008 [0.001–0.053] |
16 (9.57%) | 0.687 [0.559–0.792] | 0.025 [0.006–0.099] |
17 (1.77%) | 0.859 [0.739–0.929] | 0.075 [0.027–0.193] |
18 (2.84%) | 0.944 [0.859–0.979] | 0.203 [0.089–0.397] |
19 (1.42%) | 0.979 [0.929–0.994] | 0.443 [0.202–0.714] |
20 (0.71%) | 0.992 [0.965–0.998] | 0.713 [0.348–0.920] |
21 (0.71%) | 0.997 [0.982–1.00] | 0.886 [0.508–0.983] |
1Relative good performance is defined as being in the top 25% of the total QoC score distribution.
2 Absolute good performance is defined as performing ≥80% of all observed routine L&D actions correctly; 2.84% of deliveries demonstrated absolute good performance
3 Mean = 12.12, median = 12