Skip to main content
. 2015 May 29;8(6):545–559. doi: 10.1111/eva.12263

Table 1.

Overview of bank vole and Puumala virus samples used in this study

Locality Year Voles Virus strains S/M/L S, M, L Prevalence (%)
Schledehausen 2005 15 2 1/2/2 1 13.3
2006 4 0 0 0 0*
2007 37 5 4/4/4 4 13.5
2008 7 4 3/3/3 3 57.1*
2009 20 5 4/3/4 3 25
2010 20 17 17/17/17 17 85
2011 29 4 4/4/3 3 13.7
2012 29 25 23/22/24 22 86.2
Astrup 2006 3 0 0 0 0*
2007 28 10 9/10/10 9 35.7
2008 12 6 5/5/6 5 50
2009 3 1 1/1/1 1 33.3*
2010 17 17 17/16/17 16 100
2011 5 2 2/2/2 2 40*
2012 15 13 12/12/11 10 86.66
Ellerbeck 2005 6 0 0 0 0*
2007 18 5 5/5/5 5 27.7
2008 1 1 1/1/1 1 100*
2009 2 0 0 0 0*
2010 6 5 5/5/5 5 83.3*
2011 0
2012 2 2 2/2/2 2 100*
Bramsche Varus 2007 22 0 0 0 0
2008 1 0 0 0 0*
2009 2 1 1/1/1 1 50*
2010 4 3 3/3/3 3 75*
2011 1 0 0 0 0*
2012 2 2 2/1/2 1 100*
Bramsche Tower 2007 8 1 1/1/1 1 12.5*
Total 319 131 122/120/124 115 41

Number of bank voles and Puumala virus (PUUV) strains at each trapping site per year, number of sequences for each PUUV genome segment (S/M/L) and the concatenated sequences (S, M, L), and PUUV prevalence in the bank voles. Asterisks indicate prevalence estimates based on vole sample sizes lower than 10.