Table 2. Confusion matrix for the decision tree based on distance and turning angle, for the four dominant types of behaviour (open field, 1 min interval).
Results training sample | Results validation | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Observed | Predicted | Predicted | ||||||||
Foraging | Lying | Standing | Walking | Correct (%) | Foraging | Lying | Standing | Walking | Correct (%) | |
Foraging | 498 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 98 | 443 | 19 | 5 | 3 | 94 |
Lying | 8 | 41 | 0 | 0 | 84 | 21 | 33 | 1 | 0 | 60 |
Standing | 12 | 10 | 4 | 0 | 15 | 26 | 12 | 4 | 0 | 10 |
Walking | 2 | 0 | 0 | 24 | 92 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 42 | 100 |
Overall (%) | 86 | 10 | 1 | 4 | 93 | 81 | 11 | 2 | 7 | 86 |
To the left the results of the training sample that was used for tree building and on the right the results after validation of the decision tree.