. 2015 Jun 25;5:11588. doi: 10.1038/srep11588

Table 2. Results of sub-group meta-analysis using different genetic models.

Analysis models	Heterogeneity		Fixed		Random		Inference
Analysis models	I²	P	OR	P	OR	P	Inference
Caucasians
GG vs. (GC + CC)	77.15	0	1.011	0.797	0.989	0.911	Not significant
GG vs. GC	86.11	0	0.838	0	0.793	0.088	Not significant
GG vs. CC	73.54	0	2.398	0	1.852	0.011^*	Significant association
GC vs. CC	90.2	0	4.408	0	2.388	0.023^*	Significant association
(GG + GC) vs. CC	87.32	0	3.754	0	2.139	0.016^*	Significant association
East–Asians
GG vs. (GC + CC)	16.04	0.31	1.095	0.314	1.112	0.295	Not significant
GG vs. GC	27.49	0.25	1.049	0.607	1.074	0.535	Not significant
GG vs. CC	0	0.37	1.611	0.061	1.611	0.061	Not significant
GC vs. CC	0	0.41	1.641	0.061	1.641	0.061	Not significant
(GG + GC) vs. CC	0	0.39	1.596	0.064	1.596	0.064	Not significant
Mixed
GG vs. (GC + CC)	0	0.63	0.97	0.431	0.97	0.431	Not significant
GG vs. GC	0	0.48	0.948	0.186	0.948	0.186	Not significant
GG vs. CC	49.52	0.08	1.443	0.029	1.169	0.652	Not significant
GC vs. CC	56.7	0.04	1.513	0.016	1.129	0.754	Not significant
(GG + GC) vs. CC	51.01	0.07	1.451	0.026	1.163	0.669	Not significant

^*Indicates statistical significance