Skip to main content
. 2015 Jun 5;56(4):1087–1096. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2015.56.4.1087

Table 4. Changes in Vascular Leakage and Visual Acuity during Follow Up in Behçet Retinal Vasculitis.

Change in leakage* Change in VA Overall
Peripheral retinal vasculitis Posterior pole-involved retinal vasculitis
Total VA loss No change in VA VA gain Total VA loss No change in VA VA gain
Worsened (%) 2 (8.7) 1 (4.3) 1 (4.3) 0 (0) 10 (15.9) 3 (4.8) 7 (11.1) 0 (0) 12 (13.9)
No change (%) 17 (73.9) 1 (4.3) 12 (52.2) 4 (17.4) 32 (50.8) 5 (7.9) 23 (36.5) 4 (6.3) 49 (56.9)
Improved (%) 4 (17.4) 1 (4.3) 3 (13.0) 0 (0) 21 (33.3) 3 (4.8) 13 (20.6) 5 (7.9) 25 (29.1)
Total (%) 23 (100) 3 (13.0) 16 (69.6) 4 (17.4) 63 (100) 11 (17.5) 43 (68.3) 9 (14.3) 86 (100)
Coefficient of correlation (Kendall's tau, τ) τ=-0.034 (p=0.75) τ=0.199 (p=0.092)

VA, visual acuity.

Follow up=time interval between the baseline and the closest-to-two year follow-up visit. p-value<0.05 is considered statistically significant.

*Retinal vascular leakage, optic disc hyperfluorescence, and macular leakage were compared collectively between the initial and at 2 year time point within a 3 months window. Worsened=there was an increase in the magnitude of the overall vascular leakage, No change=there was no discernible difference in the degree of leakage, Improved=there was a decrease in the magnitude of the overall vascular leakage.

For a change in VA to be considered a gain, there had to be an improvement of at least three Snellen chart lines between the initial VA and VA at 2 year time point within a 3 months window. A drop of at least three Snellen chart lines was considered a loss of VA. A change in VA of fewer than three lines was regarded as no change.