Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Urology. 2015 Apr 8;85(6):1376–1381. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2015.02.025

Table 2.

Patient evaluation of item importance and clarity

N=54 Item Rating as Medium or High
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6 Q7 Q8 Q9 Q10 Q11 Q12
Importance,
n (%) 		48/54
(89)		 41/54
(76)		 43/54
(80)		 37/54
(69)		 42/54
(78)		 41/54
(76)		 42/54
(78)		 37/54
(69)		 41/54
(76)		 48/54
(89)		 49/54
(91)		 36/54
(67)
Clarity*,
n (%) 		51/53
(96)		 50/53
(94)		 48/53
(91)		 49/53
(92)		 49/53
(92)		 50/53
(94)		 49/53
(92)		 47/53
(89)		 50/53
(94)		 50/53
(94)		 52/53
(98)		 46/53
(87)

N = number,

*

1 patient did not complete the clarity section,

Q = question