Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Urology. 2015 Apr 8;85(6):1376–1381. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2015.02.025

Table 3.

A PIP questionnaire criterion-oriented validity based on patient subgroups
Item Total QoL SF PW
Priapism Activity, median (IQR)
   Active (n=42) 45.5 (30.8–57.3) 18.5 (12.8–21.0) 15.5 (9.0–21.3) 13.0 (8.8–16.0)
   Remission (n=8) 21.5 (16.5–42.3) 10.0 (8.0–14.8) 7.5 (5.3–17.3) 4.0 (3.0–8.8)
   P Value 0.0106 0.0159 0.0921 0.0017
Priapism Severity, median (IQR)
   High (n=16) 55.5 (40.5–67.0) 20.5 (18.3–23.8) 20.5 (11.3–26.3) 15.0 (11.8–18.0)
   Low (n=34) 35.0 (24.5–48.3) 14 (4.0–19.3) 10.0 (6.0–19.3) 9.0 (4.8–13.0)
   P Value 0.0019 0.0020 0.0244 0.0007
Erectile Dysfunction, median (IQR)
   Present (n=16) 53.0 (32.8–63.3) 19.5 (12.0–24.0) 21.5 (13.0–27.0) 11.5 (7.3–18.8)
   Absent (n=32) 36.0 (24.3–51.8) 16.5 (10.3–20.0) 10.5 (6.3–19.5) 9.5 (6.3–14.8)
   P Value 0.0250 0.1366 0.0024 0.2498
Priapism Etiology, median (IQR)
   SCD (n=36) 38.5 (25.3–52.3) 16.0 (10.3–19.8) 12.0 (7.0–19.8) 10.0 (6.3–14.0)
   Non-SCD (n=18) 52.0 (36.5–68.5) 20 (15.3–24.3) 20.0 (10.3–24.8) 12.0 (8.0–16.5)
   P Value 0.0318 0.0170 0.0432 0.1596
B Correlation coefficients for a priori hypotheses
Item Total P Value QoL P Value SF P Value PW P Value
Priapism Activity
(Active vs Remission)
0.367 0.009 0.346 0.014 0.243 0.090 0.451 0.001
Priapism Severity
(High vs Low)
0.446 0.001 0.443 0.001 0.323 0.022 0.487 0.0003
Erectile Dysfunction
(Present vs Absent)
0.329 0.023 0.219 0.135 0.444 0.002 0.170 0.249

PIP = priapism impact profile, QoL = quality of life, SF = sexual function, PW = physical wellness SCD = sickle cell disease, yrs = years, IQR = Interquartile Range,

values absent for 4 patients,

values absent for 6 patients