Skip to main content
. 2015 Jul;21(7):1183–1188. doi: 10.3201/eid2107.130955

Table 3. Comparison of chronic Q fever diagnosis according to the Dutch consensus guideline* and the alternative criteria†.

Alternative criteria Dutch consensus chronic Q fever guideline
Proven, no. (%), n =151 Probable, no. (%), n = 64 Possible, no (%), n = 69
Definite Q fever endocarditis 21 (13.9) 0 0
Possible Q fever endocarditis 8 (5.3) 4 (6.3) 0
Definite Q fever vascular infection 76 (50.3) 0 0
Possible Q fever vascular infection 0 2 (3.1) 0
No diagnosis of chronic Q fever 46 (30.5) 58 (90.6) 69 (100.0)

*Source (14).
†Source (16).