Skip to main content
. 2015 Mar 8;6(10):7774–7787. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.3484

Table 1. Association of CYP1B1 expression with the clinicopathologic characteristics of RCC.

Pathologicalvariables Total (n = 59),n (%) CYP1B1 expression P
Weak (n = 17) Moderate (n = 19) Strong (n = 23)
Age
Mean ± SD, years 66.2 ± 6.8 - - -
Sex
Men 37/59 (62.7) 12/37 (45.9) 10/37 (27.0) 15/37 (40.5) 0.5201
Women 22/59 (37.2) 5/22 (22.7) 9/22 (40.9) 8/22 (36.4)
Histological type
Clear cell 49/59 (83.0) 13/49 (26.5) 17/49 (34.7) 19/49 (38.8) 0.5204
Papillary 7/59 (11.9) 2/7 (28.6) 1/7 (14.3) 4/7 (57.1)
Granular 1/59 (1.7) - 1/1 (100) -
Tubular 1/59 (1.7) 1/1 (100) - -
Oncocytoma 1/59 (1.7) 1/1 (100) - -
Tumor stage
pT1 31/59 (52.5) 9/31 (29.0) 7/31 (22.6) 11/31 (35.5) 0.0977
pT2 11/59 (18.6) 2/11 (18.2) 4/31 (12.9) 9 (81.8)
pT3 13/59 (22.0) 6/13 (46.2) 6/13 (46.2) 1/13 (7.7)
pT4 4/59 (6.8) - 2/4 (50.0) 2/4 (50.0)
Nuclear grade
1 35/59 (59.3) 14/35 (40.0) 12/35 (34.3) 9/35 (25.7) 0.1656
2 14/59 (23.7) 2/14 (14.3) 3/14 (21.4) 9/14 (64.2)
3 6/59 (10.2) 1/6 (16.7) 2/6 (33.3) 3/6 (50.0)
4 4/59 (8.5) - 2/4 (50.0) 2/4 (50.0)
Vascular invasion
Negative 56/59 (94.9) - - -
Positive 3/59 (5.1) - - -
Capsular invasion
Negative 57/59 (96.6) - - -
Positive 2/59 (3.4) - - -