Skip to main content
. 2015 Apr 28;42(8):1192–1201. doi: 10.1007/s00259-015-3048-z

Table 1.

Demographics, baseline characteristics and oncological histories of the cohort

Characteristic Value
Sex (male/female), n 68/54
Age (years), median (range) 62 (25–92)
Tumour cell type, n (%)
 Hepatocellular carcinoma 26 (21.3)
 Cholangiocarcinoma 18 (14.7)
 Metastatic neuroendocrine carcinoma 20 (16.4)
 Metastatic colorectal carcinoma 29 (23.8)
 Othera 29 (23.8)
Previous systemic treatment, n (%)
 Cytotoxic chemotherapy 74 (60.7)
 Bevacizumab 36 (29.5)
 Sorafenib 12 (9.8)
 Anti-EGFR agents 18 (14.8)
Previous liver-directed treatment, n (%)
 Transarterial (chemo)embolization 27 (22.1)
 Partial liver resection 26 (21.3)
 Radiofrequency ablation 18 (14.8)
 External beam radiation therapyb 8 (6.6)
 Hepatic radioembolization 7 (5.7)
ECOG performance status, n (%)
 0 54 (44.3)
 1 58 (47.5)
 2 10 (8.2)
Extrahepatic disease, n (%) 61 (50)
 Lung 37 (30.3)
 Lymph nodes 16 (13.1)
 Bone 10 (8.2)
Estimated liver tumour involvement (%), median (range) 25 (5–70)
Maximum tumour diameter (mm), median (range) 52 (15–133)
Liver cirrhosis, n (%) 22 (18)
Microspheres, n (%)
 Resin 98 (80.3)
 Glass 24 (19.7)
Treatment, n (%)
 Whole liver 97 (79.5)
 Lobar 25 (20.5)
Administered activity (GBq), median (range) 1.73 (0.43–6.21)

EGFR epidermal growth factor receptor

aIncludes sarcoma (five patients), melanoma (four), renal cell carcinoma (three), pancreatic adenocarcinoma (three), oesophageal carcinoma (three), ovarian carcinoma (one), urothelial carcinoma (one), small-cell lung carcinoma (one), lymphoma (one), cervical carcinoma (one), thymic carcinoma (two), breast carcinoma (two), ampullary carcinoma (one), and gastronintestinal junction carcinoma (one)

bThe mean radiation absorbed dose to the liver was determined by dose–volume histogram analysis. All mean liver doses >1 Gy were included