Skip to main content
. 2015 May 6;33(7):955–964. doi: 10.1007/s00345-015-1561-0

Table 2.

Results from focal HIFU studies mentioning post-treatment histological outcomes

Study Total number of patients Treatment modality Biopsy method for initial diagnosis Protocol or for-cause biopsy method Number of patients with a positive post-procedural biopsy/total number of biopsied patients Biopsy significance Subsequent treatment
Muto et al. [29] 29 HIFU TRUS Protocol 6–12 months
TRUS
3/28 at 6 months
4/17 at 12 months
NA ADT
Fegoun et al. [30] 12 HIFU NA Protocol 12 months
TRUS
1/12 1/1 NS Redo HIFU (1)
Ahmed et al. [14] 20 HIFU Template mapping Protocol 6 months
mpMRI + TRUS targeted of treated side only
2/19 ipsilateral 2/2 NS AS (1)
Redo HIFU (1)
Ahmed et al. [31] 41 HIFU Template mapping Protocol 6 months
mpMRI + TRUS targeted of treated side only
9/39 ipsilateral 6/9 NS AS (5)
Redo HIFU (4)
Dickinson et al. [32] 88 HIFU NA For cause
mpMRI + TRUS targeted
20/72 ipsilateral 10/20 NS NA
Velthoven et al. [33] 27 HIFU TRUS + concordance with mpMRI lesion 2 months after biopsy For cause (rising PSA) 3/5 contralateral 3/3 contralateral Contra-lateral HIFU (3)

HIFU high-intensity focused ultrasound, TRUS transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy, NA not available, NS non-significant, ADT androgen deprivation therapy, AS active surveillance