Skip to main content
. 2015 Jun 24;10(6):e0128182. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0128182

Table 2. Ranking of candidate models describing variables influencing daily mean 2-week recession rate use of Great Egrets, White Ibises, and Wood Storks in the Florida Everglades (Proc Mixed).

GREAT EGRET MODEL Kb AICcc modelid ΔAICcd wie R2
Recess, Recess SD, Depth SD, Depth*Recess 6 -337.7 23 0.00 0.44 0.95
Recess, Recess SD, Recess2, Depth SD, Depth*Recess, Recess*DSD 8 -335.5 9 2.23 0.14
Recess, Recess SD, Recess, Depth, Depth SD, Depth*Recess, Cells 9 -334.9 8 2.85 0.11
Variable N Avg PE SE Importance
Intercept 27 0.123 0.04 1.00
Recess 16 1.074 0.04 1.00
Recess SD 10 0.247 0.05 1.00
Depth SD 10 -0.012 0.00 0.98
Depth*Recess 10 -0.004 0.00 0.83
WHITE IBIS MODEL Kb AICcc modelid ΔAICcd wie R2
Recess, Recess SD, Depth*Recess 5 -281.5 23 0.00 0.34 0.95
Recess, Recess SD, Recess2, Depth*Recess 6 -281.1 8 0.46 0.27
Recess, Recess SD, Recess2, Depth SD, DSD, Depth*DSD, Depth*Recess, Depth*DSD 9 -279.5 26 2.01 0.13
Variable N Avg PE SE Importance
Intercept 27 0.017 0.02 1.00
Recess 16 1.156 0.04 1.00
Recess SD 10 0.150 0.11 1.00
Depth*Recess 10 -0.013 0.05 1.00
WOOD STORK MODEL Kb AICcc modelid ΔAICcd wie R2
Recess, Recess SD, Depth SD, Depth*Recess 6 -46.9 24 0.00 0.33 0.85
Recess, Recess SD, Recess2, Depth SD, Depth*Recess, Recess*DSD 8 -46.5 26 0.41 0.27
Recess, Recess SD, Depth SD, Depth*Recess, Recess*DSD 7 -45.0 9 1.83 0.13
Recess, Recess SD, Depth*Recess 5 -45.0 23 1.91 0.13
Variable N Avg PE SE Importance
Intercept 27 0.055 0.08 1.00
Recess 18 1.128 0.07 1.00
Recess SD 12 0.560 0.11 1.00
Depth*Recess 10 -0.010 0.00 1.00
Depth SD 12 -0.011 0.00 0.97

Models are ranked by differences in Akaike’s information criterion and only candidate models within ΔAICc d ≤ 4.0 are presented. Model selection results are followed by model averaging results for each species. The R2 represents the model fit for the estimated mean daily recession rate use vs. model averaged predicted values.