Table 2. Ranking of candidate models describing variables influencing daily mean 2-week recession rate use of Great Egrets, White Ibises, and Wood Storks in the Florida Everglades (Proc Mixed).
GREAT EGRET MODEL | Kb | AICcc | modelid | ΔAICcd | wie | R2 |
Recess, Recess SD, Depth SD, Depth*Recess | 6 | -337.7 | 23 | 0.00 | 0.44 | 0.95 |
Recess, Recess SD, Recess2, Depth SD, Depth*Recess, Recess*DSD | 8 | -335.5 | 9 | 2.23 | 0.14 | |
Recess, Recess SD, Recess, Depth, Depth SD, Depth*Recess, Cells | 9 | -334.9 | 8 | 2.85 | 0.11 | |
Variable | N | Avg PE | SE | Importance | ||
Intercept | 27 | 0.123 | 0.04 | 1.00 | ||
Recess | 16 | 1.074 | 0.04 | 1.00 | ||
Recess SD | 10 | 0.247 | 0.05 | 1.00 | ||
Depth SD | 10 | -0.012 | 0.00 | 0.98 | ||
Depth*Recess | 10 | -0.004 | 0.00 | 0.83 | ||
WHITE IBIS MODEL | Kb | AICcc | modelid | ΔAICcd | wie | R2 |
Recess, Recess SD, Depth*Recess | 5 | -281.5 | 23 | 0.00 | 0.34 | 0.95 |
Recess, Recess SD, Recess2, Depth*Recess | 6 | -281.1 | 8 | 0.46 | 0.27 | |
Recess, Recess SD, Recess2, Depth SD, DSD, Depth*DSD, Depth*Recess, Depth*DSD | 9 | -279.5 | 26 | 2.01 | 0.13 | |
Variable | N | Avg PE | SE | Importance | ||
Intercept | 27 | 0.017 | 0.02 | 1.00 | ||
Recess | 16 | 1.156 | 0.04 | 1.00 | ||
Recess SD | 10 | 0.150 | 0.11 | 1.00 | ||
Depth*Recess | 10 | -0.013 | 0.05 | 1.00 | ||
WOOD STORK MODEL | Kb | AICcc | modelid | ΔAICcd | wie | R2 |
Recess, Recess SD, Depth SD, Depth*Recess | 6 | -46.9 | 24 | 0.00 | 0.33 | 0.85 |
Recess, Recess SD, Recess2, Depth SD, Depth*Recess, Recess*DSD | 8 | -46.5 | 26 | 0.41 | 0.27 | |
Recess, Recess SD, Depth SD, Depth*Recess, Recess*DSD | 7 | -45.0 | 9 | 1.83 | 0.13 | |
Recess, Recess SD, Depth*Recess | 5 | -45.0 | 23 | 1.91 | 0.13 | |
Variable | N | Avg PE | SE | Importance | ||
Intercept | 27 | 0.055 | 0.08 | 1.00 | ||
Recess | 18 | 1.128 | 0.07 | 1.00 | ||
Recess SD | 12 | 0.560 | 0.11 | 1.00 | ||
Depth*Recess | 10 | -0.010 | 0.00 | 1.00 | ||
Depth SD | 12 | -0.011 | 0.00 | 0.97 |
Models are ranked by differences in Akaike’s information criterion and only candidate models within ΔAICc d ≤ 4.0 are presented. Model selection results are followed by model averaging results for each species. The R2 represents the model fit for the estimated mean daily recession rate use vs. model averaged predicted values.