Table 1.
Populations used and quantitative agronomic trait data evaluated previously
| Population | Varieties | Breeding clones | Total | Traits evaluateda | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BRUISE | 85 | 120 | 205 | BI, SCB, PM, TS, TSC, TY | [52] |
| CHIPS-ALL | 34 | 194 | 228 | CQA, CQS, TSC, TY, TSY | [50, 51, 54] |
| EURO-CUL | 187 | 3 | 190 | - | [83] |
| GBC | 511 | 25 | 536 | PM, RLBF, RLBT | [55] |
| PIN184 | - | 184 | 184 | PM, rAUDPC, MCR, TSC | [56] |
| SUGAR40 | 39 | 1 | 40 | RSC | [53] |
aBI, bruising index; SCB, starch corrected bruising; PM, plant maturity; TS, tuber shape; TSC tuber starch content; TY, tuber yield; TSY, starch yield (=TSC × TY); CQA, chip quality after harvest; CQS, chip quality after 3 months storage at 4 °C; RLBF, foliage resistance to late blight; RLBT, tuber resistance to late blight; rAUDPC, the relative area under disease progress curve for the field infestation of Phytophthora infestans; MCR, maturity corrected resistance to late blight; RSC, tuber reducing sugar content