Skip to main content
. 2015 Jun 11;2015:678756. doi: 10.1155/2015/678756

Table 2.

Cox proportional hazards models showing mutually adjusted hazard ratios and their 95% confidence intervals for breast cancer mortality in women with diabetes.

Variables Interpretation Mutually adjusted hazard ratio 95% confidence interval P value
Age Every 1-year increase 1.027 (1.012, 1.042) 0.0005
Diabetes duration Every 1-year increase 1.017 (0.995, 1.040) 0.1298
Diabetes type Type 2 vs. Type 1 1.418 (0.527, 3.814) 0.4887
Body mass index Every 1-kg/m2 increase 0.973 (0.933, 1.015) 0.2091
Smoking Yes vs. No 1.000 (0.442, 2.261) 0.9995
Insulin use Yes vs. No 1.339 (0.782, 2.293) 0.2878
Area of residence Urban vs. Rural 1.294 (0.955, 1.752) 0.0958

Sensitivity analyses
Excluding patients who died of breast cancer within 3 years of diabetes onset
Age Every 1-year increase 1.031 (1.016, 1.047) <0.0001
Diabetes duration Every 1-year increase 1.020 (0.998, 1.043) 0.0719
Diabetes type Type 2 vs. Type 1 1.378 (0.513, 3.706) 0.5250
Body mass index Every 1-kg/m2 increase 0.976 (0.935, 1.020) 0.2780
Smoking Yes vs. No 1.047 (0.462, 2.370) 0.9126
Insulin use Yes vs. No 1.384 (0.806, 2.375) 0.2387
Area of residence Urban vs. Rural 1.333 (0.976, 1.819) 0.0705

Sensitivity analyses conducted after excluding patients who died of breast cancer within 5 years and 7 years of diabetes onset separately did not remarkably change the adjusted hazard ratios.