Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Jun 26.
Published in final edited form as: Chemphyschem. 2005 Sep 5;6(9):1853–1865. doi: 10.1002/cphc.200400602

Table 8.

Proton affinities [kcal mol−1] determined by GHO, based on BLYP, mPWPW91, mPW1PW91, and MPW1K, compared with the corresponding fully QM results.

System GHO-(H)DFT/6–31G(d)[a] (H)DFT/6–31G(d) QM/MM vs. QM
BLYP
CH3BH2–AH2CH2O 398.8 394.4 4.3
CH3BH2–AH2CH2S 367.8 366.5 1.2
CH3BH2–AH2C(O)O 364.4 363.6 0.8
mPWPW91
CH3BH2–AH2CH2O 396.7 394.6 2.2
CH3BH2–AH2CH2S 367.2 366.1 1.1
CH3BH2–AH2C(O)O 364.5 363.5 0.9
mPW1PW91
CH3BH2–AH2CH2O 399.3 397.7 1.6
CH3BH2–AH2CH2S 366.9 366.0 0.8
CH3BH2–AH2C(O)O 364.1 364.2 −0.2
MPW1K
CH3BH2–AH2CH2O 401.6 400.5 1.2
CH3BH2–AH2CH2S 0.5
CH3BH2–AH2C(O)O 364.7 364.9 −0.3
[a]

Scaled by the scaling factors (listed in Table 1) optimized for GHO-B3LYP/6–31G(d).