Skip to main content
Genome Announcements logoLink to Genome Announcements
. 2015 Jun 25;3(3):e00699-15. doi: 10.1128/genomeA.00699-15

Draft Genome Sequences of Two Toxigenic Corynebacterium ulcerans Strains

Marc-Christian Domingo a,b,, Eric Fournier a, Cynthia Massé a, Hugues Charest a,c, Kathryn Bernard d, Jean-Charles Côté a, Cécile Tremblay a
PMCID: PMC4481292  PMID: 26112794

Abstract

Here, we present the draft genome sequences of two toxigenic Corynebacterium ulcerans strains isolated from two different patients: one from a blood sample and the other from a scar exudate following surgery. Although these two strains harbor the diphtheria toxin gene tox, no full prophage sequences were found in the flanking regions.

GENOME ANNOUNCEMENT

Three Corynebacterium species are capable of producing the diphtheria toxin: C. diphtheriae, C. ulcerans and, to a lesser extent, C. pseudotuberculosis. The toxin is encoded by the tox gene located within a prophage lysogenized in the bacterial chromosome (1, 2). In developing countries, diphtheria is caused by toxigenic C. diphtheriae. In developed countries, however, diphtheria-like infections caused by toxigenic C. ulcerans have outnumbered those caused by toxigenic C. diphtheriae (3, 4).

Here, we present the draft genome sequences of two toxigenic C. ulcerans strains. Strains LSPQ-04227 (NML 040264) and LSPQ-04228 (NML 130346) were isolated from two different patients, one from a blood sample and the other from a scar exudate following thoracic surgery. Both strains were identified as C. ulcerans based on growth on Tinsdale plates (5), biochemical profiles on bioMérieux API Coryne microbial identification strips, and 16S rRNA gene sequences. The presence of the tox gene, typical of toxigenic strains, was confirmed by PCR (6). An Elek’s test (7) confirmed the toxigenicity of both strains.

Both genomes were sequenced on an Ion Torrent PGM sequencer (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA). A total of 4,230,671 reads were sequenced for a total of 653 Mbp for isolate LSPQ-04227, while 2,672,954 reads were sequenced for a total of 468 Mbp for isolate LSPQ-04228. The quality of the raw sequence data was checked using FastQC (http://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc/). SPAdes version 3.5 (http://bioinf.spbau.ru/spades [8]) was used to assemble each genome. The annotations were done using the NCBI Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline version 2.10 (9).

The draft genome sequence of LSPQ-04227 is 2,428,218 bp, with an average G+C content of 53.4%. It consists of 10 contigs, ranging in size from 363 to 691,756 bp, with an N50 of 543,718 bp. A total of 1,772 protein-coding sequences, 51 tRNAs, 5 rRNAs, and 342 pseudo-genes are predicted. The draft genome size of LSPQ-04228 is 2,439,377 bp, with an average G+C content of 53.4%. It consists of 23 contigs, ranging in size from 213 to 410,667 bp, with an N50 of 276,589 bp. A total of 1,717 protein-coding sequences, 53 tRNAs, 11 rRNAs, and 424 pseudo-genes are predicted. In strain LSPQ-04227, the tox gene is on contig 1 and covers nucleotide positions 202029 to 203711. In strain LSPQ-04228, the tox gene is on contig 5, positions 77442 to 79124. Interestingly, whereas in C. diphtheriae the tox gene is carried by a lysogenic phage, here, an alignment of both C. ulcerans tox genes and flanking sequences with Corynebacterium phage sequences (10, 11) showed an absence of phage-like sequences, with the exception of an integrase 32 kbp upstream the tox gene.

Nucleotide sequence accession numbers.

These whole-genome shotgun projects have been deposited at the NCBI under the accession numbers JZUS00000000 (strain LSPQ-04227) and JZUT00000000 (strain LSPQ-04228). The versions described in this paper are the first versions, JZUS00000000.1 and JZUT00000000.1, respectively.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was supported in-house by Laboratoire de Santé Publique du Québec.

We thank Louise Ringuette and Dominique Paquette for technical assistance.

Footnotes

Citation Domingo M-C, Fournier E, Massé C, Charest H, Bernard K, Côté J-C, Tremblay C. 2015. Draft genome sequences of two toxigenic Corynebacterium ulcerans strains. Genome Announc 3(3):e00699-15. doi:10.1128/genomeA.00699-15.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Funke G, Bernard KA. 2011. Coryneform Gram-positive rods, p 413–442. In Versalovic J, Carroll KC, Funke G, Jorgensen JH, Landry ML, Warnock DW (ed), Manual of clinical microbiology, 10th ed. ASM Press, Washington, DC. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.de Mattos Guaraldi AL, Hirata JR, Ariston de Carvalho Azevedo V 2014. Corynebacterium diphtheriae, Corynebacterium ulcerans and Corynebacterium pseudotuberculosis—General aspects, p 15–37. In Burkovski A (ed), Corynebacterium diphtheriae and related toxigenic species. Springer Science+Business Media, Dordrecht, the Netherlands. doi: 10.1007/978-94-007-7624-1_2. [DOI]
  • 3.Wagner KS, White JM, Crowcroft NS, De Martin S, Mann G, Efstratiou A. 2010. Diphtheria in the United Kingdom, 1986–2008: the increasing role of Corynebacterium ulcerans. Epidemiol Infect 138:1519–1530. doi: 10.1017/S0950268810001895. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Zakikhany K, Efstratiou A. 2012. Diphtheria in Europe: current problems and new challenges. Future Microbiol 7:595–607. doi: 10.2217/fmb.12.24. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Tinsdale GFW. 1947. A new medium for the isolation and identification of C. diphtheriae based on the production of hydrogen sulphide. J Pathol Bacteriol 59:461–466. doi: 10.1002/path.1700590313. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Pallen MJ, Hay AJ, Puckey LH, Efstratiou A. 1994. Polymerase chain reaction for screening clinical isolates of corynebacteria for the production of diphtheria toxin. J Clin Pathol 47:353–356. doi: 10.1136/jcp.47.4.353. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Elek SD. 1949. The plate virulence test for diphtheria. J Clin Pathol 2:250–258. doi: 10.1136/jcp.2.4.250. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Bankevich A, Nurk S, Antipov D, Gurevich AA, Dvorkin M, Kulikov AS, Lesin VM, Nikolenko SI, Pham S, Prjibelski AD, Pyshkin AV, Sirotkin AV, Vyahhi N, Tesler G, Alekseyev MA, Pevzner PA. 2012. SPAdes: a new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J Comput Biol 19:455–477. doi: 10.1089/cmb.2012.0021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Tatusova T, DiCuccio M, Badretdin A, Ciufo S, Li W. 2013. Prokaryotic genome annotation pipeline. In Beck J, Benson D, Coleman J, Hoeppner M, Johnson M, Maglott M, Mizrachi I, Morris R, Ostell J, Pruitt K, Rubinstein W, Sayers E, Sirotkin K, Tatusova T (ed), The NCBI Handbook, 2nd ed National Center for Biotechnology Information, Bethesda, MD: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK174280/. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Bukovska G, Klucar L, Vlcek C, Adamovic J, Turna J, Timko J. 2006. Complete nucleotide sequence and genome analysis of bacteriophage BFK20—a lytic phage of the industrial producer Brevibacterium flavum. Virology 348:57–71. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2005.12.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Chen CL, Pan TY, Kan SC, Kuan YC, Hong LY, Chiu KR, Sheu CS, Yang JS, Hsu WH, Hu HY. 2008. Genome sequence of the lytic bacteriophage P1201 from Corynebacterium glutamicum NCHU 87078: evolutionary relationships to phages from Corynebacterineae. Virology 378:226–232. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2008.05.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genome Announcements are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES