Skip to main content
. 2015 Jul;7(4):303–307. doi: 10.1177/1941738114539627

Table 1.

General study characteristics

Study LOE LHB Procedure Patient No. Male Patients, % Mean Patient Age, y Mean Follow-up, mo FOM
Franceschi et al7 I Tenotomy 27 55.6 64.7 62.4 UCLA
Kim et al11 II Tenotomy 20 45.0 63.3 24.0 UCLA
ASES
SST
Dezaly et al5 II Tenotomy 68 44.1 67.5 12.0 Constant
Koh et al12 II Tenotomy 41 22.0 66.0 27.9 ASES
Tenodesis 43 37.2 65.0 27.1 Constant
De Carli et al4 I Tenotomy 30 NR 56.9 23.0 Constant
Tenodesis 35 NR 56.3 25.0 SST
Zhang et al27 I Tenotomy 77 46.8 61.0 25.0 Constant
Tenodesis 74 47.3 61.0 25.0 VAS
Checchia et al2 IV Tenodesis 15 60.0 62.0 32.4 UCLA
Franceschi et al7 IV Tenodesis 22 50.0 59.2 47.3 UCLA
Nho et al19 IV Tenodesis 13 84.6 54.7 34.6 ASES
SST
VAS
Ji et al9 IV Tenodesis 39 38.5 56.2 16.0 UCLA
ASES
SST
VAS
Kim et al10 IV Tenodesis 20 60.0 56.0 32.0 ASES Constant
VAS
Lu et al16 IV Tenodesis 41 46.3 57.7 12.0 UCLA
Constant
SST
VAS

ASES, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score; Constant, Constant-Murley score; DASH, Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score; FOM, functional outcome measures; LHB, long head of the biceps tendon; LOE, level of evidence; NR, not reported; repairable RCT, repairable rotator cuff tear (as determined by study investigators); SST, Simple Shoulder Test score; UCLA, University of California Los Angeles score; VAS, visual analog scale.