Skip to main content
. 2015 Jul;7(4):326–334. doi: 10.1177/1941738115576729

Table 1.

Patient demographics and rotator cuff tear classification

Study Level of Evidence Study Type Patients Enrolled, n Patients at Final Follow-up, n Mean Follow-up, mo Average Age, y Men Women Small Tear (<1 cm) Medium Tear (1-3 cm) Large Tear (3-5 cm)
Arndt et al1 1 Early vs late mobilization 100 92 16 55 34 58 NR NR NR
Cuff and Pupello3 1 Early vs late mobilization 68 68 12 63 38 30 NR NR NR
Düzgün et al4 1 Early vs late mobilization 29 29 6 56 3 26 NR 12 17
Garofalo et al6 1 CPM vs manual therapy 100 100 12 60 47 53 NRa NRa NRa
Keener et al7 1 Early vs late mobilization 145 114 24 55 73b 51b NR NR NR
Kim et al8 1 Early vs late mobilization 117 105 12 60 44 61 NRc NRc NR
Lee et al9 1 CPM vs manual therapy 85 64 25 55 41 23 0 41 23

CPM, continuous passive mobilization; NR, not reported.

a

All had C2-C318 rotator cuff tears (C2, <2 cm; C3, 3-4 cm).

b

Reflects patients who underwent surgery.

c

All were small- or medium-sized tears.