Skip to main content
. 2015 Feb 19;31(13):2141–2150. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv101

Table 4.

Variant positions, common to more than one population and having a rate >5% in passage 120

Protein AA position AA change Number of population samples Virus variants Passage 1 average rate Passage 60 average rate Passage 120 average rate
VP3 234 Q > E 2 WT 0.0024 0.4682 0.6749
3D 372 A > V 3 WT 0.0010 0.0256 0.3701
VP2 137 L > P 2 372 0.0005 0.0959 0.3317
VP3 204 A > V 8 WT 372 299 0.0006 0.0462 0.2560
3A 51 T > A 3 299 0.0013 0.0125 0.2477
VP2 138 D > N 4 WT 299 0.0003 0.0116 0.2206
3B 6 V > L 5 WT 372 0.0001 0.0113 0.1498
VP4 21 N > D 4 WT 372 0.0003 0.0310 0.1493
VP4 17 N > D 6 WT 372 299 0.0011 0.0088 0.1219
VP4 15 R > G 4 372 299 0.0011 0.0036 0.0760
3D 299 S > T 2 WT 372 0.0004 0.0058 0.0626

Seven variants were within viral capsid proteins, two in 3D, one in 3A and one in 3B. The 3D mutations are the known natural fidelity variants of the polymerase: S299T, known to decrease viral replication fidelity, and A372V, known to increase viral replication fidelity. By passage 120, the S299T variant, accumulated to 5% and 1% of the A372V and WT populations respectively. A372V accumulated in all three WT populations with an average rate of 37% at passage 120. These observations suggest that viral populations may fine tune their mutation rates during their infection cycles by generating mixed populations of fidelity variants, so as to increase adaptability (fidelity decrease) while maintaining genetic integrity (fidelity increase).