Table 2.
Comparison of model fit for different profile solutions for parenting factors (n = 6,250)
| Profile Solutions |
||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | |
| Age 2 | ||||||
| AIC | 126322.65 | 121402.65 | 119516.95 | 118350.44 | 117015.92 | 116256.07 |
| BIC | 126391.14 | 121512.24 | 119667.63 | 118542.23 | 117248.80 | 116530.05 |
| Adj. BIC | 126359.37 | 121461.40 | 119597.72 | 118453.25 | 117140.75 | 116402.94 |
| Entropy | - | .990 | .992 | .940 | .940 | .940 |
| LRT p value | - | .00 | .00 | .01 | .01 | .09 |
| % Profile 1 | 1.00 | .72 | .16 | .25 | .55 | .56 |
| % Profile 2 | - | .28 | .55 | .03 | .14 | .02 |
| % Profile 3 | - | - | .28 | .14 | .03 | .03 |
| % Profile 4 | - | - | - | .58 | .25 | .23 |
| % Profile 5 | - | - | - | - | .03 | .03 |
| % Profile 6 | - | - | - | - | - | .13 |
| Kindergarten | ||||||
| AIC | 176663.43 | 171038.77 | 163849.33 | 161382.29 | 159857.83 | 158846.40 |
| BIC | 176731.92 | 171148.35 | 164000.01 | 161574.07 | 160090.70 | 159120.37 |
| Adj. BIC | 176700.14 | 171097.51 | 163930.10 | 161485.09 | 159982.66 | 158993.26 |
| Entropy | - | .996 | .999 | .966 | .963 | .929 |
| LRT p value | - | .00 | .00 | .06 | .20 | .30 |
| % Profile 1 | 1.00 | .90 | .10 | .14 | .14 | .55 |
| % Profile 2 | - | .10 | .76 | .11 | .63 | .14 |
| % Profile 3 | - | - | .14 | .65 | .02 | .09 |
| % Profile 4 | - | - | - | .10 | .11 | .10 |
| % Profile 5 | - | - | - | - | .10 | .10 |
| % Profile 6 | - | - | - | - | - | .02 |
Note. AIC = Akaike Information Criterion. BIC = Bayesian Information Criterion. LRT = Lo-Mendell-Rubin Adjusted Test.