Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Jun 26.
Published in final edited form as: Prenat Diagn. 2008 Oct;28(10):892–899. doi: 10.1002/pd.2079

Table 2. Technology comparison of NRBC enrichment efficiencies.

Study Pregnancy status Number of cases Gestational age (weeks) Mean cells/mL Median cells/mL Range cells/mL Method
Artemis Health Singleton 37 9–22 37.68 21.08 0.37–168.27 CSM/HE
Abnormal 21 11–21 37.20 18.13 0.99–274.36 CSM/HE
Slunga-Tallberg et al., 1995 Singleton 37/40 6–17 0.63 0.20 0.05–11.50 miniMACS
Takabayashi et al., 1995 Not Given 33/60 4–40 2.05 0.50–11.00 Density gradient
Babochkina et al., 2005 Not Given 11 11–40 16.00 2.00–59.00 SBA-Lectin
11 11-40 2.00 0.00–6.00 MACS
Purwosunu et al., 2006b Singleton 22 9–34 2.08 0.16–13.66 Galactose–Lectin
Post-termination 23 6–19 Galactose–Lectin
Mavrou et al., 2007 Normal (preamnio) 282 14–28 0.40 0.05–0.60 MACS
Abnormal (postamnio) 23 14–28 1.75 0.35–5.65 MACS
Carriers B-thal 26 14–28 2.10 1.10–7.90 MACS
Abnormal Doppler 20 14–28 0.75 0.10–3.75 MACS
Sekizawa et al., 2007 Singleton 20 10–18 0.91 0.97 0.17–1.69 Galactose–Lectin
Kwon et al., 2007 Normal 24 11–24 1.95 1.55 0.20–4.80 Double density gradient/MACS
Abnormal 1 13 5.40

CSM, cell separation microchip; HE, hemoglobin enrichment; MAC, magnetic-activated cell sorting.