Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Jun 26.
Published in final edited form as: JAMA Psychiatry. 2013 Dec;70(12):1363–1371. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2013.2105

Table 3.

Research Needs

Defining/Identifying “Risk” Communicating Risks Managing Risks
  • How do potential participants and families/surrogates, investigators, and IRB members define risk?

  • What risks are most worrisome to potential participants?

  • What benefits matter most to potential participants, surrogates, and society?

  • How do IRBs make decisions regarding risks and how do they compare risks and benefits?

  • What techniques are most effective for improving participant understanding of research risks? For example, what practices6

    • Help individuals to sort and manage significant amounts of information?

    • Help individuals understand numbers and probabilities?

    • Reduce cognitive biases?

    • Improve understanding of health information?

    • Facilitate communication of information typically provided in writing?

    • Enhance retention and recall of information?

    • Promote the exchange of information that matters most to potential participants?

  • What variables affect understanding and appreciation of risk information?

  • What “toolkits” may investigators employ to help develop and implement effective and comprehensive risk management strategies?

  • What are effective ways to train research staff to manage risk, particularly in higher risk studies?

  • Are there risk management strategies that should be used when clinicians also serve as investigators?

  • How do participants, researchers, and IRBs respond to different risk management plans?

Note: In answering research questions about the views and assessments of participants or populations of potential participants, it is important to attend to individual differences.