Skip to main content
. 2015 Jun 26;10(6):e0129268. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0129268

Table 3. Univariate and multivariate analyses of PFS and OS.

Characteristics PFS OS
Univariate Multivariate Univariate Multivariate
p value HR (95% CI) p value p value HR (95% CI) p value
Age ≤ 60 vs. > 60 0.17 0.83 (0.60–1.16) 0.28 0.003 0.70 (0.49–0.99) 0.045
ECOG PS 0–1 vs. ≥ 2 0.70 1.00 (0.68–1.47) 0.99 0.16 0.86 (0.58–1.28) 0.46
CCr (mL/min) ≥ 60 vs. < 60 0.004 0.59 (0.40–0.87) 0.008 0.011 0.72 (0.49–1.08) 0.11
Primary site UUT vs. bladder 0.43 1.13 (0.83–1.52) 0.44 0.56 0.85 (0.62–1.17) 0.31
Histologic variant VUC vs. PUC 0.004 1.53 (1.10–2.15) 0.013 0.007 1.67 (1.16–2.40) 0.006
Visceral metastasis Yes vs. No < 0.0001 1.92 (1.40–2.64) < 0.0001 0.009 1.54 (1.11–2.13) 0.009
1st line chemotherapy Cisplatin- vs. Carboplatin-based 0.44 1.48 (0.90–2.44) 0.12 0.24 1.33 (0.81–2.18) 0.26

Abbreviations: CCr, clearance of creatinine; CI, confidence interval; ECOG, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; HR, hazard ratio; OS, overall survival; PFS, progression-free survival; PS, performance status; PUC, pure urothelial carcinoma; UUT, upper urinary tract; VUC, variants of urothelial carcinoma