Table 2. Hierarchical multiple regression analyses predicting the global-to-local interference effect (ΔRT Incongruent Local—Congruent Local trials).
| B | S.E. | b | t | p | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Step 1 | ||||||
| Intercept | -6.23 | 26.36 | -2.36 | 0.814 | ||
| Age | -0.1 | 0.27 | -0.01 | -0.04 | 0.97 | |
| Gender | -1.1 | 8.47 | -0.02 | -0.13 | 0.9 | |
| Education | 4.3 | 3.61 | 0.16 | 1.18 | 0.242 | |
| Step 2 | ||||||
| Intercept | -9.54 | 29.21 | -0.33 | 0.75 | ||
| Age | -0.15 | 0.28 | -0.08 | -0.56 | 0.581 | |
| Gender | -6.39 | 8.97 | -0.11 | -0.71 | 0.48 | |
| Education | 5.91 | 3.75 | 0.23 | 1.58 | 0.12 | |
| RPBS | 7.83 | 5.13 | 0.28 | 1.53 | 0.13 | |
| CBQ | -4.23 | 2.07 | -0.31 | -2.04 | 0.046 |
Note: ΔR2 = .17 for Step 1; ΔR2 = .33 for Step 2.