Table 3. Hierarchical multiple regression analyses predicting the local-to-global interference effect (ΔRT Incongruent Global—Congruent Global trials).
| B | S.E. | b | t | p | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Step 1 | ||||||
| Intercept | 10.11 | 23.5 | 0.43 | 0.669 | ||
| Age | -0.29 | 0.24 | -0.16 | -1.21 | 0.23 | |
| Gender | 0.08 | 7.55 | 0 | 0.01 | 0.99 | |
| Education | 3.21 | 3.22 | 0.14 | 1 | 0.323 | |
| Step 2 | ||||||
| Intercept | -4.3 | 25.36 | -0.17 | 0.866 | ||
| Age | -0.24 | 0.24 | -0.14 | -0.99 | 0.325 | |
| Gender | 2.04 | 7.8 | 0.04 | 0.26 | 0.76 | |
| Education | 2.93 | 3.25 | 0.13 | 0.9 | 0.372 | |
| RPBS | -2.85 | 4.56 | -0.11 | -0.64 | 0.526 | |
| CBQ | 4.73 | 1.8 | 0.39 | 2.63 | 0.011 |
Note: ΔR2 = .22 for Step 1; ΔR2 = .41 for Step 2.