Skip to main content
. 2015 Jun 25;7(7):702–713. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v7.i7.702

Table 5.

Result of endotherapy for iatrogenic esophageal perforation1

Ref. Type of treatment Patients (n) Technical success (%) Complications (%)
2Freeman et al[43] SEPS 19 100 24
Vallböhmer et al[44] SEMS 12 100 8
2van Heel et al[45] SEMS/ SEPS 31 100 33
Schimdt et al[46] SEMS ± clip (1) 22 100 NA
Swinnen et al[47] SEMS 23 100 NA
D’Cunha et al[48] SEMS/ SEPS 15 95 13
Biancari et al[49], Stents ± clip (1) 12 100 25
Schweigert et al[50] SEMS/ SEPS 13 100 85
2Heits et al[51] Vaccum therapy 10 100 20
Biancari et al[52] SEMS/clip 67 100 34

1Only studies with 10 or more patients have been included;

2

Study design was prospective, rest were all retrospective. NA: Not available; OTSC: Over-the-scope clip; SEMS: Self-expandable metal stent; SEPS: Self expandable plastic stent.