Table 5.
Ref. | Type of treatment | Patients (n) | Technical success (%) | Complications (%) |
2Freeman et al[43] | SEPS | 19 | 100 | 24 |
Vallböhmer et al[44] | SEMS | 12 | 100 | 8 |
2van Heel et al[45] | SEMS/ SEPS | 31 | 100 | 33 |
Schimdt et al[46] | SEMS ± clip (1) | 22 | 100 | NA |
Swinnen et al[47] | SEMS | 23 | 100 | NA |
D’Cunha et al[48] | SEMS/ SEPS | 15 | 95 | 13 |
Biancari et al[49], | Stents ± clip (1) | 12 | 100 | 25 |
Schweigert et al[50] | SEMS/ SEPS | 13 | 100 | 85 |
2Heits et al[51] | Vaccum therapy | 10 | 100 | 20 |
Biancari et al[52] | SEMS/clip | 67 | 100 | 34 |
1Only studies with 10 or more patients have been included;
Study design was prospective, rest were all retrospective. NA: Not available; OTSC: Over-the-scope clip; SEMS: Self-expandable metal stent; SEPS: Self expandable plastic stent.