Skip to main content
. 2014 Sep 16;17(4):580–587. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/nou233

Table 3.

Neurocognitive performances by glioma grade

Domain and Test Glioma Grade
Pa
II
III
IV
N z-Score Mean (SD) N z-Score Mean (SD) N z-Score Mean (SD)
Attention
 Digit Span 15 −0.44 (0.66) 20 −0.47 (0.63) 37 −0.75 (0.78) .236
Learning and Memory
 HVLT-R TR 15 −0.75 (1.32) 20 −0.81 (0.99) 37 −2.11 (1.79) .002*
 HVLT-R DR 8 −0.98 (1.83) 10 −0.88 (1.14) 20 −1.45 (2.19) .688
 HVLT-R Recog 8 −0.25 (0.55) 10 −0.29 (1.27) 19 −1.27 (2.12) .214
Processing Speed
 Digit Symbol 15 −0.16 (1.07) 20 0.58 (0.90) 36 −0.30 (0.67) .001*
 TMTA 15 −0.36 (2.05) 20 −0.10 (1.05) 36 −0.49 (2.72) .816
Executive Function
 TMTB 14 −1.53 (2.48) 20 −0.49 (2.53) 34 −1.88 (2.83) .186
 Similarities 14 −0.24 (0.84) 20 −0.08 (0.63) 35 −0.46 (0.95) .286
 COWA 15 −0.36 (0.85) 20 −0.19 (1.10) 37 −1.16 (1.08) .002*
Language
 Token 15 0.16 (0.89) 20 0.11 (0.87) 37 −0.72 (1.33) .010*
 Naming 15 −0.62 (0.93) 19 −0.31 (1.09) 37 −1.25 (1.25) .013*
Visuospatial Function
 Block Design 14 −0.36 (0.96) 20 0.32 (0.83) 37 −0.17 (0.93) .072
Motor Function
 Grip 15 0.06 (1.12) 19 0.07 (0.84) 35 −0.45 (0.82) .063
 Peg 15 0.27 (0.75) 20 0.22 (1.35) 36 −0.43 (1.23) .069
CTB Comp 8 −0.38 (0.71) 10 −0.56 (0.94) 19 −0.97 (1.17) .384

aOne-way ANOVA used for group comparisons. Post hoc comparisons performed with Tukey's honestly significant difference or Games–Howell tests.

*ANOVA significant, P ≤ .05; post hoc comparisons: HVLT-R TR (grade IV < III & grade IV < II), Digit Symbol (grade IV < grade III & grade II < grade III), COWA (grade IV < grade III & grade IV < grade II), Token (grade IV < grade III & grade IV < grade II), Naming (grade IV < grade III).