Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Eur Urol. 2014 Oct 31;67(4):619–626. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.10.010

Table 1.

Clinico-pathologic variables and biomarkers for risk stratification

Authors and references ‘Significant’ predictors/findings ‘Not significant’ predictors Outcome Analysis
Tseng et al (5)
  • Maximum % core involvement ≥35%; % percent fPSA ≤15% (outcome: progression at initial biopsy)

  • PSA density ≥0.08, max percent core involvement ≥5%, and cancer present on initial surveillance biopsy (outcome: second or subsequent biopsy)

Age, PSA, PSAD
(outcome: progression at initial biopsy)
Age, PSA, percent fPSA
(outcome: progression at second or subsequent biopsy)
Biopsy progression
(defined at surveillance biopsy as Gleason pattern 4 or 5, >2 biopsy cores with cancer or
>50% involvement of any core with cancer) upon 1) initial surveillance biopsy and 2) second or subsequent surveillance biopsy
Multivariate
Abern et al (8) Black race, PSA, household income Age, insurance, number of biopsy cores at diagnosis Discontinuation of AS for treatment
(all cause and due to progression excluding preference)
Multivariate 3 models adjusting for socio economic and clinical parameters at the time of PC diagnosis
Iremashvili et al (9) African American race, prostate volume, PSA density at diagnosis, 2 positive biopsy cores (vs. 1) Age at diagnosis, Hispanic, metabolic syndrome components, family history, negative prostate biopsies before diagnosis, clinical stage, PSA High grade cancer, more than 2 positive cores or greater than 20% involvement of any core on surveillance biopsy. Multivariate
Sundi et al (10) AA race independent predictor of reclassification by grade PSA, prostate size, BMI. AA race was not associated with reclassification by volume. Reclassification on serial biopsy
(by grade or volume, by grade only, and by volume only)
Multivariate
Cohn et al (11) Model 1:PNI, BMI, race/ethnicity (African-American), PSA density.
Model 2: PNI, Number of positive cores at diagnostic biopsy
Maximum single core involvement, total tumor length AS failure at confirmation biopsy (Gleason ≥7, >3 cores positive, single core with >50% involvement, and/or tumour volume >5% of total biopsy volume) Multivariate Model 1: PNI and non-biopsy variables significant p<0.2 in univariate.
Model 2: Biopsy variables
Cullen et al (12) Younger age, black race, comorbidity, higher T stage, higher Gleason
(shorter time to secondary treatment
Age, PSADT
(mortality)
Time to secondary treatments, all-cause mortality Multivariate
Fleshner et al (13) Higher age, family history, dutasteride administration, baseline PSA, baseline prostate volume Race, PSA velocity, baseline DHT/T Disease progression (any indication of prostate cancer treatment or pathological progression) Multivariate
Smith et al (14) Initial cancer core length, PSAV
(trend)
Baseline PSA, baseline grade, stage, age, race Positive second biopsy Univariate
Dall’ Era et al (15) PSA density ≥0.15 at diagnosis, increase in GS on repeat biopsy Age at diagnosis, race, relationship status, clinical risk group, PSA velocity >0.75 ng/ml/year Active treatment Multivariate
Patel et al (16) PSA velocity risk count of 2 increased reclassification risk in next year Age at diagnosis, race, PSAD at diagnosis, overall PSAV during follow-up and cancer on first surveillance biopsy Biopsy reclassification
(>2 positive cores, >50% core involvement, or GS >6))
Multivariate (Adjusted for age at diagnosis, race, PSAD at diagnosis, overall PSAV during followup and cancer on first surveillance biopsy.)
Shappley et al (17) Outcome 1: age. clinical stage.
Outcome 2: clinical stage. PSA, Gleason
Outcome 1: Race, height, BMI, PSA at diagnosis, Gleason.
Outcome 2: Age, deferred treatment at >12 months
Outcome 1: Time to initiation of active treatment. Outcome 2: time to metastasis or death as a result of PCa. Multivariate
Lin et al (18) Log PSA, abnormal DRE PCA3, TMPRSS2:ER G, family history, race, age
(N.B. subset analysis of men with negative DRE had similar results)
Gleason ≥7 Multivariate
Bul et al (19) Baseline variables: number of positive cores (2 vs 1 core), PSA density, age, baseline PSA value. Also PSA-DT at the time of repeat biopsy Clinical T stage, number of biopsy cores Reclassification
(defined as >2 positive cores or Gleason >6 at repeat biopsy)
Multivariate Model 1: 1st repeat biopsy.
Model 2: All repeat biopsies
Klotz et al (20) Outcome 1: clinical stage >T2, GS >6 at baseline (predict definitive treatment). Outcome 2: PSADT <3 years (higher likelihood of BCR).
Outcome 3: Age (higher risk of non-prostate cancer mortality than prostate cancer mortality)
Outcome 1: PSA >10 at baseline. Outcomes 1: Time to treatment,
Outcome 2: PSA failure after radical treatment,
Outcome 3: Mortality
Univariate
Sternberg et al (21) Nomogram including Age. clinical stage. PSA, # positive cores at diagnosis. % positive cores at diagnosis, # negative and positive biopsies to date Progression
(defined as failure to meet the inclusion criteria during follow up)
Multivariate
Whitson et al (22) Lower prostate volume, older age
(increased odds of progression)
PSADT, time to repeat biopsy, stage (T2 vs T1c), biopsy source (UCSF vs other), Johns Hopkins criteria eligibility Biopsy progression on repeat biopsy within 24 months of diagnosis (GS ≥7, >33% of cores positive or >50% of the maximum core positive) Multivariate Adjusted for age, prostate volume, clinical stage, biopsy source, whether the case met Johns Hopkins AS protocol criteria and time from diagnostic to repeat biopsy
Zhang et al (23) High risk: Baseline PSA, time
Low risk: Baseline PSA, age, GS, time
Patients at high risk for progression had much shorter PSADT on average than patients at low risk.
Average predicted evolution of serial PSA measurements over time estimated from a general linear mixed model of the natural log of PSA, by risk group, with high risk defined as an increase in Gleason grade to at least 7 (4+3) on repeat biopsy and low risk if not. General linear mixed model
Berg et al (24) Percentage of positive biopsies (PPB), ERG positivity
(outcome 2)
ERG positivity
(outcome 4)
Clinical T stage, diagnostic GS, age, PSA density, maximum tumour involvement
(outcome 2)
Clinical T stage, diagnostic GS, age, percentage of positive biopsies (PPB), PSA density, maximum tumour involvement
(outcome 4)
  1. Clinical progression (increased clinical stage ≥cT2b).

  2. Histopathologic progression (upgrade, >3 positive cores and/or bilateral positive cores).

  3. PSA progression (PSA doubling time <3 yr).

  4. Overall AS progression.

Multivariate
Bul et al (25) Model 1: PSA density and number of initial positive cores (two vs one). Model 2: PSA density and number of initial positive cores (two vs one), PSADT <3 yr Age, PSA, clinical stage, and total number of biopsy cores Reclassification at repeat biopsy (>2 positive cores or Gleason >6). Multivariate Models with (1) baseline characteristic s and (2) also with PSADT at repeat biopsy
Cary et al (26) Negative confirmatory biopsy and lower PSA density predicted decreased risk of progression at 3 and 4 years. At 4 years, having negative confirmatory and year 3 biopsy Age, clinical stage, percentage of diagnostic positive biopsy cores (3 & 4 years)
Age, clinical tumor stage, percentage of diagnostic positive biopsy cores (4 yr)
Upgrading to GS ≥4+3, >33% positive cores, and/or>50% of a single core at 3 year and 4 year timepoints Multivariate
Eggener et al (27) Cancer on 2nd biopsy and higher # of cancerous cores on the 2 biopsies combined Age, PSA, clinical stage, prostate volume, total number of biopsy cores sampled Remaining on active surveillance Univariate
Hirama et al (28)
  • Prostate volume (base model only)

  • Baseline %p2PSA

  • Phi

Age, percentage of positive cores, maximum cancer involvement and %free PSA
(base model).
Prostate volume in model adjusted for %p2PSA and phi.
Pathological reclassification
(GS ≥7, >2 positive biopsy cores or more than 50 % cancer involvement of any biopsy core) upon the 1 year prostate biopsy
Multivariate
Klotz et al (29) Decrease PSA
free-to-total ratio correlated with a rapid PSADT.
Short PSADT → more aggressive phenotype at radical prostatectomy
(A short PSADT was also a criterion for active treatment)
Grade, stage, baseline PSA and patient age
(outcome 1)
  1. PSADT

  2. Aggressive findings at radical prostatectomy

Univariate
Makarov et al (30) Serum marker: [−2]proPSA/% fPSA
Tissue markers: [−5/−7]proPSA % area and [−5/−7]proPSA stain intensity in benign adjacent areas
Age; tPSA; fPSA; %fPSA; [−2]proPSA (pg/mL); PSA density; prostate volume; number of positive cores; maximum % core involvement with cancer; cancer [−5/−7]proPSA % area, and stain intensity in tumor areas Unfavorable
biopsy conversion on annual surveillance biopsy (GS ≥7, ≥3 cores positive for cancer, >50% of any core involved with cancer)
Univariate
Soloway et al (31) PSADT, clinical stage Age, PSA level and Gleason score at diagnosis “Progression to treatment” = treatment received yes/no (based on PSADT, GS ≥7, increased tumor volume, stage progression or patient preference) Multivariate
Venkitaraman et al (32) PSA density and maximum tumor involvement of any core PSA velocity (p=0.069), age, clinical T stage, GS score, initial PSA Histological disease progression on repeat biopsy
(defined as primary GS ≥4, >50% positive cores or a GS increase from 6 or less to 7 or greater)
Multivariate
Cornu et al (33) PSA density, PCA3, TMPRSS2:ERG Genotypes for rsl447295 and rs6983267 (both on 8q24), testosterone, age, positive family history Gleason 4 Multivariate Model including both AS and men with elevated PSA
Isharwal et al (34) Serum markers: −2proPSA, Prostate Health Index phi. Tissue markers: DNA content in benign adjacent and cancer tissue areas Age, PSA, free PSA, %free PSA, PSAD, # cores with cancer, max percent core involved with cancer Unfavourable biopsy conversion
(GS≥7, Gleason pattern 4/5, ≥3 cores positive for cancer, >50% of any core involved with cancer)
Multivariate
van den Bergh (35) # positive cores at initial biopsy Age, clinical stage, PSA, PSADT, prostate volume, time to rebiopsy, # biopsy cores taken at diagnosis or rebiopsy, difference in # of biopsy cores, ratio between initial and repeat # of cores. No baseline factor associated with adverse pathology at delayed prostatectomy Unfavorable repeat biopsy findings, delayed prostatectomy pathology Univariate
San Francisco et al (36) Analysis 1: PSA density >0.08 ng/ml/cc, combination of PSAD and family history of PCa as risk score.
Analysis 2: PSAV: PSA density, family history and risk score with all 3.
Analysis 3: validated the PSAD cutoff of + 0.08 ng/ml/cc at first rebiopsy.
Progression
(defined as ≥3 positive cores, increased grade (Gleason ≥7) and/or >50% of any core involved with cancer)
Multivariate Analysis 1: clinical and pathologic variables at diagnosis biopsy
Analysis 2: Considering changes between diagnosis biopsy and 1st rebiopsy.
Analysis 3: For men with ≥2 repeat biopsies
Valeri et al (37) Men in 40s with family history less likely to have insignificant prostate cancer vs general population Insigificant PCa Descriptive
Burton et al (38) Smoking status
(outcome 1). exercise, height
(outcome 1,2)
(N.B.: correlation PSA baseline and PSA growth)
GS>7 (outcome 1,2) compared to <6 (outcome 1 and 2)
Weight; BMI; waist circumference; hip circumference; inside leg length; alcohol; family history; occupational class 1) PSA at age 50 and 2) PSA growth (yearly increase in log PSA) Multivariate Adjusted for age and GS
(not in analysis that includes GS)
Goh et al (39) Family history (FH) of PCa and single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) not associated with adverse histology or time to treatment +Recommendation for treatment due to PSAV >l
+ng/ml/year or adverse histology
(>50% of cores involved/any increase in +primary GS/increase in composite GS of +>=8)
Univariate
Mukerji et al (40) Number of positive cores, presence of high grade PIN, and Gleason score 4 Failure of AS, switching to active treatment Univariate
Van den Bergh et al (41) Gleason 7 who met all other AS criteria better treatment free survival than those who did not. Gleason score 3+4 better than 4+3 Treatment-free survival Univariate
Venkitarama n et al (42) PSA density Clinical T stage, GS, initial PSA level, maximum percentage involvement of any core PSA velocity before treatment
(as an important predictor of prostate cancer mortality)
Multivariate
Jhavar et al (43) Ki-67 (max Ki-67 labelling index). Gleason score. PSA density Initial PSA Time to radical treatment
(recommended for PSAV >1 ng/ml/year, GS ≥4+3, or >50% cores involved)
Multivariate
Van As et al (44) Free/total PSA ratio, clinical stage T2a (vs Tl) Initial PSA level, Gleason score, PSA density, prostate volume, % positive cores, number of positive cores, and maximum involvement of any core Time to radical treatment based on PSA velocity > 1 ng/ml/yr or histological progression (GS ≥4+3, or > 50% positive biopsy cores) Multivariate
Iremashvili et al (45) Significant predictors combined into a nomogram: Number of positive cores on diagnostic and first surveillance biopsy, race, PSAD Mean and max percent core involvement Histologic progression during successive surveillance biopsies Multivariate
Iremashvili et al (46) Number of positive cores (on diagnostic or 1st surveillance biopsy) and mean %core involvement (diagnostic biopsy). HGPIN significant for combination of the 2 biopsies Number of cores taken Biopsy progression (presence of Gleason 4/5 cancer, > two positive cores or >20% involvement of any core) +Multivariate Using data from diagnostic biopsy, first surveillance biopsy or both
Ng et al (47) PSAD, PSAV, PSADT, max percentage of any core Adverse histology on repeat biopsy defined as any of: primary Gleason grade ≥4,>50% cores positive, or initial Gleason score 3+3 upgraded to ≥3+4 Multivariate Adjusted for age, T stage, Gleason score, percentage of cores positive, baseline PSA level, maximum percentage of any core involved, prostate volume, PSA density, and free-total PSA ratio).
Adamy et al (48) Positive confirmatory biopsy (modified criteria without PSA)
  • PSA at biopsy 2

  • PSA density

  • 3 positive cores on confirmatory biopsy

  • 10 or more cores at biopsy 1

Progression defined as no longer meeting eligibility criteria
  1. full criteria = including PSA greater than 10 ng/mL

  2. modified criteria (main endpoint) = excluding PSA greater than 10 ng/ml

Multivariate Adjusted for age, PSA, PSA density, prostate volume, number of positive cores, result of confirmatory biopsy (+/−) and initial biopsy extent (< 10 versus ≥ 10 cores)
Yee et al (49) Initial biopsy extent (< 10 cores vs >10 cores) Initial biopsy extent in relation to no longer meeting inclusion criteria on rebiopsy Univariate
Fromont et al (50) 1/3 no longer eligible on confirmatory bioposy Concordance initial biopsy and confirmation biopsy (≥16 cores at ≤3 months after initiation to determine if patients still met the eligibility criteria) Descriptive
Soloway et al (51) Any tumor in the lst re-Bx PSA doubling time, clinical stage Treatment free survival
(treatment indications: GS>3, increased tumor volume or # positive cores on rebiopsy, or preference)
Univariate
Umbehr et al (52) PSA concentration at entry (but nonlinear pattern-unable to identify specific cutpoint) Biopsy reclassification
(GS ≥7, any Gleason pattern 4 or 5, ≥3 positive cores, or ≥50% cancer involvement/biopsy core)
Multivariate Adjusting for age, prostate volume, mean %f PSA and maximum percentage biopsy core involvement
Barayan et al (53)’ PSA density >0.15 Disease progression, defined as the presence of >1 of the following criteria on repeat biopsies: >50% of cancer in any involved core, GS >4+3, and >3 positive biopsy cores Multivariate Adjusted for patients’ age, number of positive cores, maximum cancer percentage in any core, total number of cores and GS
Welty et al (54) PSA density, total number of biopsies, later year of diagnosis Biopsy progression (upgrade GS ≥7 or increase in volume >33% cores) Multivariate
Tosoian et al (55) Baseline and longitudinal measures of %fPSA, %[−2]proPSA; [−2]proPSA/%fPSA, Prostate health index phi (both outcomes) Baseline and longitudinal total PSA 1) Risk of biopsy reclassification (Gleason score ≥7, >2 positive biopsy cores or>50% involvement of any core with cancer); 2) Upgrading only (GS ≥7) Multivariate Adjusted for age, date of diagnosis and PSA density
Komisarenk o et al (56) Volume progression (>4 cores or>50% core involved) Relation of increased volume of Gleason 6 PCa
(4 cores or 50% of core involved) with the risk of later grade progression (>= 7)
Univariate
Loblaw et al (57) 13–86% of patients would have trigger for intervention based on PSA kinetics Proportion of patients who had a trigger for treatment based on the various prostate specific antigen triggers: PSADT, PSAV, PSA threshold Descriptive
Kakehi et al (58) Only descriptives pathological findings, no formal analysis No association between PSADT and aggressive findings on rebiopsy
  1. evaluate the validity of selection criteria and investigate the feasibility of the AS program

  2. Aggressive findings on re-biopsy of patients who remained on AS for 1 year with a PSADT > 2 years.

Descriptive
Ross et al (59) PSAV (calculated as PSA multiplied by the slope of a linear regression of log(PSA) PSADT Biopsy progression (Gleason score ≥7, or >2 positive cores, or >50% core involvement) Univariate
Khatami et al (60) PSADT
(Caveat: PSA predicting PSA & PSADT not known at time zero)
PSA, ratio of free PSA and amount of cancer in biopsy PSA relapse Multivariate
Iremashvili et al (61) PSAV in men with at least 3 PSA’s over 18 months, and those with 4th and later biopsy PSADT
(calculated using the log-slope method)
Biopsy progression
(Gleason 4/5 cancer, more than two positive cores, or more than 20% involvement of any core)
Univariate
Krakowsky et al (62) 2 men who died on AS initially met Epstein criteria. All 5 patients had a PSADT ≤1.6 years triggering radical therapy Description of 5 PCa deaths in Toronto series Descriptive
Pujara et al (63) Median PSA doubling time higher in AS patients than in the control group
Median PSA velocity lower in AS patients than in the control group
AS patients compared to control group with at least 2 negative biopsies Descriptive
Tosoian et al (66) PCA3 Progression on surveillance biopsy
(defined as Gleason pattern 4 or 5, >2 positive biopsy cores or>50% involvement of any core with cancer)
Multivariate After adjustment for age at PCA3 measurement and date of diagnosis)
Venkitamaran et al (67) Urinary levels of either daidzein, genistein. enterolactone or equol (outcome l and 2) Disease progression defined as: 1) adverse histology on repeat biopsy (primary Gleason grade >or= 4, or >50% positive cores) or 2) radical treatment for PSA velocity >1 ng/mL/year Multivariate
Tausch et al (69) NCCN risk group at entry
(very low versus low risk)
Multivariable
Van den Bergh (70) PSADT using 1st 3 PSA’s indicative of PSADT using 5 measures (15% misclassification) Correlation between PSADT using different number of PSA measurements Correlations
*

GS (Gleason score), PSA (prostate specific antigen), PSADT (prostate specific antigen doubling time), PSAV (prostate specific antigen velocity), PSAD (prostate specific antigen density), DRE (digital rectal exam)