Skip to main content
. 2015 May 30;5(2):221–232. doi: 10.1159/000380816

Table 1.

Demographic data and preintervention assessment values for the three intervention groups

CI PA GRA Difference between groups
Number of participants 45 38 44
Number of subjects completing the protocol 32 24 39
Subjects completing the protocol, % 71.1 63.2 88.6 0.021, uncorrected
Male, % 53.1 33.3 51.3 n.s.
Age, years 82.2 ± 3.8 81.3 ± 3.8 81.2 ± 4.0 n.s.
Education, years 8.1 ± 1.1 8.8 ± 1.5 9.4 ± 1.9 <0.01, uncorrected
MMSE score 22.2 ± 3.2 23.5 ± 2.4 25.1 ± 2.7 <0.01, uncorrected
WF, words/min 8.7 ± 2.9 8.1 ± 2.9 10.0 ± 3.1 n.s.
TMT-A, s 95.8 ± 40.2 91.4 ± 40.2 80.3 ± 33.8 n.s.
GDS score 5.1 ± 3.5 3.5 ± 2.7 5.3 ± 3.7 n.s.
6-meter walk time, s 4.9 ± 1.2 5.1 ± 1.3 4.8 ± 1.4 n.s.
QOL Face Scale score 5.3 ± 1.9 4.6 ± 1.5 4.7 ± 1.7 n.s.
GDS score 5.1 ± 3.5 3.5 ± 2.7 5.3 ± 3.7 n.s.

Values are presented as means ± SD unless specified otherwise. ANOVA showed significant differences in mean years of education and preintervention values of the MMSE between the groups (p < 0.01, uncorrected for multiple comparisons). The completion rate of the PA group was relatively low (63.2%), which may be accounted for by the generally limited physical tolerance of old people. n.s. = Not significant.