Skip to main content
. 2015 May 30;5(2):221–232. doi: 10.1159/000380816

Table 3.

Numbers of responders and nonresponders for each primary outcome and statistically significant baseline parameters (responder analysis)

Responders Nonresponders p
MMSE, n 42 53
 Intervention type, n
  CI 21 11 0.011, uncorrected
  PA 8 16
  GRA 13 26
MMSE score 22.4 ± 2.5 24.8 ± 3.0 <0.001, uncorrected

QOL, n 35 60
 Education, years 9.4 ± 1.9 8.4 ± 1.4 <0.005, uncorrected

WF, n 36 59

TMT-A, n 35 60

6-meter walk, n 33 62

Mean ages, mean years of education, mean scores of the GDS and baseline values of all primary outcomes (MMSE, WF, TMT-A, 6-meter walk time and QOL Face Scale) were compared between the responders and nonresponders. For each outcome measure, responders were defined as subjects who showed improvement that was equal to or greater than the cutoff point.

Better improvement in MMSE and QOL Face Scale scores correlated with lower baseline MMSE score (p < 0.001) and more years of education (p < 0.005), respectively. A weak but nonsignificant effect of the type of intervention was found for the outcome of the MMSE (p = 0.011).